FWIW, every fan base says he favors one team over another. I guess that means the reporting has been evenhanded
I can't speak for other fanbases. But if Voepel did criticize Geno for Olympic selections in which Dawn was the coach then why wouldn't it be a hint of anti-UCONN bias? The criticism Geno received had no logic, didn't it?
And Voepel did say Stanford played their worst game of the season, while if he never mentioned it when UCONN has been upset in the past for games they played poorly, then why wouldn't it be a hint of anti-UCONN bias?
Voepel is a human being just like we all are, and as a result possible to have biases. If Voepel has said some amazing things about UCONN in the last 5 years or so then okay, But if he hasn't, and for a team that has been to so many consecutive Final Fours, then why wouldn't it be a hint of anti-UCONN bias? In other words, think of all the anti-UCONN posters on here or the complainers. It gets frustrating at times that they can say very little positive about UCONN. Well if Voepel says very little positive about a program that has had such amazing success, then why wouldn't it be a hint of anti-UCONN bias?
And I am using the word "if."