Amashutcha
Basketball enjoyer
- Joined
- May 26, 2021
- Messages
- 265
- Reaction Score
- 1,440
Huge shoutout to UCTV for placing chapters in the video.
But it is a legitimate concern for a coach.But I wish he would not try to get into the subtleties and perceived hidden issues of the NIL stuff. The horse has left the barn.
Sure but not helpful as fodder for the press. Best to Just try and guide the kids in private.But it is a legitimate concern for a coach.
Could greatly affect the team chemistry.
Theoretically, does a teammate that averages 20 points a game on 39% shooting and tooling around campus in a Beemer create friction with a player that averages 11 rebounds a game and drives a ‘09 Hundai?
Yeah, that COULD create a problem.
Coach has a right to be concerned.
NIL is going to have a range of unintended and unforeseen consequences, but it required no crystal ball to realize it would have a profound impact on recruiting. Schools and programs perceived to offer the best "platforms" for a player to build their "brand" (I'm trying not to cringe when I use these terms) will have a huge leg up.I don't know if others picked up on this, but I sensed a little anger or frustration when Geno said some kids are picking schools based on NIL opportunities now, and not necessarily because of basketball. He sounded like someone who might be bitter about losing a recruit for that reason, which has me wondering if that was a big factor in Kiki's decision.
Many of us were surprised at her decision, not so much that it wasn't us, but because it wasn't Stanford or Duke either. We didn't see UCLA at the top of the basketball options or the academic options, so why UCLA? Hollywood? NIL opportunities in a huge market? I don't know and it is pure speculation on my part, but I thought Geno sounded like someone who had already seen decisions based on NIL, not just someone who was speculating that it would.
If it was a factor in Rice's decision she's about to find out what it's like to play in relative obscurity versus being on national TV every other week. There's a reason there's an east coast bias when it comes to sports (hint: it's where all the people live).I don't know if others picked up on this, but I sensed a little anger or frustration when Geno said some kids are picking schools based on NIL opportunities now, and not necessarily because of basketball. He sounded like someone who might be bitter about losing a recruit for that reason, which has me wondering if that was a big factor in Kiki's decision.
Many of us were surprised at her decision, not so much that it wasn't us, but because it wasn't Stanford or Duke either. We didn't see UCLA at the top of the basketball options or the academic options, so why UCLA? Hollywood? NIL opportunities in a huge market? I don't know and it is pure speculation on my part, but I thought Geno sounded like someone who had already seen decisions based on NIL, not just someone who was speculating that it would.
I'm disappointed in your laissez faire attitude. This is a biggee. It has to be managed diligently. I believe student-athletes should be fairly compensated. Yes, the horse has left the barn, but it doesn't have to knock your house down. Yes, the boogie man is actually here, not just lurking in the shadows. It needs to be kept under control. Your 18 year old child can drive now. The situation still has to be managed. (analogy alert- oops too late for that)But I wish he would not try to get into the subtleties and perceived hidden issues of the NIL stuff. The horse has left the barn.
whoa! i wouldn't bet on that. at his age (and many BYers) he's just as likely to see it as the final straw and conclude 'ah, f-- it. i don't need this kind of crap' and go off to golf, family and a great life of leisure. in fact. i'd think that is the more likely result.First - a very good and informative interview. Geno rarely disappoints.
As to NIL, ....
Geno will adapt. He always has, but on his timeline. ....
Oldhuskie, after listening to him, I thought the same thing. But, at this time, I’m willing to move on. I’m rooting for UCONN to win every game, while wishing the best for Kiki and UCLA.I don't know if others picked up on this, but I sensed a little anger or frustration when Geno said some kids are picking schools based on NIL opportunities now, and not necessarily because of basketball. He sounded like someone who might be bitter about losing a recruit for that reason, which has me wondering if that was a big factor in Kiki's decision.
Many of us were surprised at her decision, not so much that it wasn't us, but because it wasn't Stanford or Duke either. We didn't see UCLA at the top of the basketball options or the academic options, so why UCLA? Hollywood? NIL opportunities in a huge market? I don't know and it is pure speculation on my part, but I thought Geno sounded like someone who had already seen decisions based on NIL, not just someone who was speculating that it would.
Maybe because they have worked so hard to reach this level without allowing the hoopla and adulation to turn them into narcissistic jerks? I think concern is probably closer than bitterness.Geno says Paige and Azzi "deserve it" with respect to NIL. Why do they deserve it? Definitely picked up on a little bitterness about NIL.
So the other players on the team don't work hard?Maybe because they have worked so hard to reach this level without allowing the hoopla and adulation to turn them into narcissistic jerks? I think concern is probably closer than bitterness.
Very tricky topic! Should be a major thread I believe. (give poor Liv and Dorka a rest)So the other players on the team don't work hard?
I don't know if others picked up on this, but I sensed a little anger or frustration when Geno said some kids are picking schools based on NIL opportunities now, and not necessarily because of basketball. He sounded like someone who might be bitter about losing a recruit for that reason, which has me wondering if that was a big factor in Kiki's decision.
Many of us were surprised at her decision, not so much that it wasn't us, but because it wasn't Stanford or Duke either. We didn't see UCLA at the top of the basketball options or the academic options, so why UCLA? Hollywood? NIL opportunities in a huge market? I don't know and it is pure speculation on my part, but I thought Geno sounded like someone who had already seen decisions based on NIL, not just someone who was speculating that it would.
Should have said: "I wish Kiki well." I had her name in there somewhere but cut it out and failed to replace.First of all, UCLA is a WORLD-CLASS university. It competes well with research universities across the world. As of a few years ago, more students applied for admission to UCLA than any other school in America. It is clearly one of the very finest public universities in America. So it may not be Stanford (most schools aren't), and it may not quite be Duke, but UCLA most certainly qualifies as high academics.
Second, there are upwards of 38 million people in California, a huge share of which reside in Southern California. But the "relative obscurity" is still a good point, because the competition for attention, media coverage, and being an "it" person will be huge.
I wish her well, and I hope she helps Coach Close get over the hump regarding national stature.
I feel like Geno is fine with NIL as long as it doesn't impact his process.. I'm sure every coach feels that way.I don't know if others picked up on this, but I sensed a little anger or frustration when Geno said some kids are picking schools based on NIL opportunities now, and not necessarily because of basketball. He sounded like someone who might be bitter about losing a recruit for that reason, which has me wondering if that was a big factor in Kiki's decision.
Many of us were surprised at her decision, not so much that it wasn't us, but because it wasn't Stanford or Duke either. We didn't see UCLA at the top of the basketball options or the academic options, so why UCLA? Hollywood? NIL opportunities in a huge market? I don't know and it is pure speculation on my part, but I thought Geno sounded like someone who had already seen decisions based on NIL, not just someone who was speculating that it would.
That was good!The reporters must be reading the Boneyard. One question started with “We haven’t asked you about rotation in an hour. . .”