Why should his coaching at the end of the game be any different than what he did the previous 39 minutes and 30 seconds? It's like he took the night off or wanted to just let them play to see if anyone would take over and be the leader that so far hasn't emerged.Caught the last 4-5 minutes of their game. For as great of a coach as he is I never really know what he's doing at the end of close games. They happen so infrequently but the times I've seen it the team always looks confused...
Tonight they are down 3 with around 30 seconds Arkansas ball and a little over 3 second difference between game and shot clock. He has them play it out straight up, no first trying to pressure the ball handler trying to trap them and no attempt at a foul. He just lets the girl take the shot clock all the way to the end, UConn gets the rebound off a miss and by the time they call a timeout there's .3 seconds left. I wouldn't play that out in the men's game, there's no way in the women's game they are going to get the ball back with enough time to get it up the court to tie it. Dumbfounding.
He seems to be trying to get Paige to be the leader but she's still playing with a team first mentality.................until the latter part of this game at least, and maybe that's the result he was hoping for.
More important to have someone become the leader of a leaderless team than to worry about losing a road game.