Gary Apell of SNY said it best

[AnonChoice]

Not all calls are the same ... It's hard not to put the FIX argument on a call when you see all the incredible HYPE about Catlin Clark and Iowa ... you would almost not even known that UConn who has the most championships in Women's basketball history was playing in the lead up to this game .... It was Catlin, Catlin Catlin Greatest Etc etc etc and the bestest of all time .... hype hype hype on steroids and you are going to let UConn take away the possibity of maybe Catlin ending her career without a national championship??? The audacity .... if you think that the referee didn't consciously or unconsciously make that call because it suited the national championship hope of ESPN and a national audience, I've got a bridge for you .... That was a FIX if not a conscious one, definitely an unconscious one and UConn who is the class program in the annuals of women's basketball takes the hit because of Caitlin Clark being the GOAT in some people's eyes .... kind of ridiculous considering 99% of the country didn't know who she was until late last season and this one ... obviously she's a highly talented player but she's not a Maya Moore or a Diana Taurasi or a Breanna Stewart or Candace Parker or at least a dozen other former players but she became a media darling and so they need to give her a chance for a title to sell her biography as an ELITE

Exactly.

 

[Superhuskies]

Gary called it a conspiracy. Don't make that call at the end. Want Iowa to play in championship?

UC STILL had to score if no call was made..... and maybe stop Iowa last second shot, especially if they had a timeout to advance the bal

 

[GoUconn7961]

What's interesting is usually on social media UConn is being vilified. Today I've seen more posts about the game being taken from them and putting an asterisk on Iowa's "win"

I don't usually root for SC - but you can bet I will be tomorrow.

 

[psconn]

The real crime in that call was NOT that it took the win away from UConn. The real crime is that the ref took the game away from the players.

This was a really good, close, hard-fought game and, win or lose, THAT is what we would have been talking about on a national scale today. Instead, Sports Center's lead after the game is about the dang call.

Whether UConn scores or not, the stories would be all about the game, the players and the coaches NOT about a refs bad decision. Might be sad for us, but is worse for WCBB as a whole.

 

[cabbie191]

First, the call against KK on this play has no impact on the call against Edwards except to fuel feelings some have that the game was fixed.

That said, the broadcast after the announcers questioned the foul on KK showed the play from a difficult angle and there was contact. In my opinion, it was absolutely incidental and in no way impeded the shooters drive to the basket. I would have let it pass.

As others have said, it isn’t whether or not Edwards committed a foul - common sense dictates there are times and circumstances when a ref should swallow the whistle on an incidental infraction and this was one of them.

For comparison, would purists want a police officer to detain a driver going two miles over the speed limit while transporting a person suffering from a heart attack to the hospital? Certainly within the legal right of the officer but in my opinion, not the right decision.

 

[tower1]

Officiating is hard, and it gets even harder in April. The pressure on them is enormous. I don't mean to excuse a bad call and a generally poorly officiated game. That ref screwed up, and the rest of his team wasn't stellar. But I'm not surprised that they make mistakes. It's as easy to second guess them as it is difficult to avoid errors in the Final Four. I wouldn't have wanted to be in their shoes.

No use trying to defend a ref. I think they make too many touch fouls that don't deserve to be called. It's almost like they are competing to see which one gets the most calls. Especially late in the game, don't decide the game !!! Let the players decide no one wants to see you everyone wants to see the players !!!

 

[hoophuskee]

The real crime in that call was NOT that it took the win away from UConn. The real crime is that the ref took the game away from the players.

This was a really good, close, hard-fought game and, win or lose, THAT is what we would have been talking about on a national scale today. Instead, Sports Center's lead after the game is about the dang call.

Whether UConn scores or not, the stories would be all about the game, the players and the coaches NOT about a refs bad decision. Might be sad for us, but is worse for WCBB as a whole.

IMO those that try to justify the call miss the very points you cite.

 

[David54]

Officials make bad calls because they are incompetent or just human at times. They may at times bow to preconceived beliefs about certain players or certain teams and their tendencies but I’ve never believed that bad calls are a conspiracy of a network, a league, or any entity. Frankly I think that’s ridiculous.

 

[Terrierdog]

NCAA wanted 2 teams from the p4 conferences and they managed to get them although it took them 39:50 minutes to accomplish it. Utter bull shat call

So we believe the conspiracy theory? I'm having a hard time deciding how viable that explanation is.

 

[Zinethar]

I'm not a conspiracy guy but I believe that in general the way that women's games are called is way different than men's games with roughly the same rules. I personally don't like the current look of the men's games but watched all of UConn men's tournament games. I heard and saw very few complaints about the refs. They were consistent for the most part. That is what you want. Players will conform to what the game officials consider callable fouls as long as they are consistent throughout the game.

One glaring difference was in the women's games the reaction to incidental contact is glaringly different. They often look like they were hammered. They try to sell the fouls. That has to be a reaction to how things are being called. I see less flopping. Not because the rules were tightened but because refs are most often just ignoring it. So it stops. On that last screen - was it a foul - maybe but the defensive player reacted as if hr head had been taken off (I could not see anything that caused that reaction). Apparently a good job by her because it worked. If officials stop being swayed by those overreactions than it will be easier to call real fouls.

 

[Centerstream]

No use trying to defend a ref. I think they make too many touch fouls that don't deserve to be called. It's almost like they are competing to see which one gets the most calls. Especially late in the game, don't decide the game !!! Let the players decide no one wants to see you everyone wants to see the players !!!

Kind of a swerve I guess, but when officials are graded, like for post season games, who is responsible for the grading and what do they use for criteria?
(Not specifically directed to tower1.)

 

[Forego]

The prime directive for every official is to ensure that the teams are playing on an even playing field. Whether or not the illegal screen call was correct or if the timing of the call was poor are arguable. What isn’t arguable is that the referees failed to fulfill the prime directive throughout the game.

 

[Seahorn]

I found this view & it's obvious. The ref is right there. Her feet ,the elbow & the movement. Gabbie Marshal said she asked the ref to watch Aaliyah Edwards on these screens throughout the game emphasizing the lowering of the shoulder. This was too obvious not minimal at all. "let the teams decide the outcome"? Where do you draw the line? I'm all for letting the game play out at the end if it's minimal but that's not the case here.

How coincidental .. Looking back & being objective how not making the call near end isn't alway the right choice..

​