Gamecocks 2025-2026 Season | Page 34 | The Boneyard

Gamecocks 2025-2026 Season

I do not recall anyone ever criticizing her defense.

Where her offense struggled, her ballhandking, defense, and rebounding more than made up for it.
Her offense, outside of her shooting, wasn't really criticized by the fanbase, either (it was our rivals who routinely made fun of Raven and are now desperately pretending it never happened). Fans knew that she was an excellent distributor whose shot was coming around. She had a down year last season.
 
I do not recall anyone ever criticizing her defense.

Where her offense struggled, her ballhandking, defense, and rebounding more than made up for it.
I do. It surprised me when I read it.
 
I do. It surprised me when I read it.
It would not surprise me if it came from the lunatic fringe of our fanbase during her rs freshman year when her knee had not completely healed. The same lunatic fans who considered Kamilla a “ wasted scholarship” that year,
 
As the primary defender against the SEC’s top 10 scorers, she [R.Johnson] has allowed just 0.571 points per possession on 25.0 percent field goal shooting.
Easily the SEC DPOY and probably the NDPOY. Like--please do not overthink this!

DPOY awards watch list
 
.-.
It would not surprise me if it came from the lunatic fringe of our fanbase during her rs freshman year when her knee had not completely healed. The same lunatic fans who considered Kamilla a “ wasted scholarship” that year,

Definitely remember folks saying Kamilla was slow and unathletic.

Have said the same about Okot.

To which I said, what?
 
Last edited:
Definitely remember folks saying Kamilka was slow and unathletic.

Have said the same about Okot.

To which I said, what?
🤨

Slow and unathletic WHERE?

Do these people know basketball?
 
South Carolina 112, Mizzou 71… a 41 point differential that was never closer than 18. Last home regular season game and Senior Night for the Gamecocks. Sole possession of the regular season championship clinched. As usual, a few observations:
  • Tessa was held out due to an “upper body contusion”. Hoping she’ll return for our last game against UK.
  • Nine players suited up, and all scored and got substantial playing time.
  • Seemed like everybody had the green light to shoot treys
  • A hard foul on Maddie, after she had picked the pocket of a Mizzou guard, had the fans fired up the entire game.
  • I have been a fierce critic of Dauda the entire year, so let me acknowledge her much improved play the last few games. Certainly not the cardboard cutout she was earlier in the year. And kudos to staff for coaching her up.
  • Maddie looks much improved, too, both offensively and defensively.
  • Makeer and McDowell have proven themselves off the bench. On less talented teams, they would start every night.
  • Tournebize looks more comfortable, and she might be next year’s biggest surprise after offseason conditioning and skill development.
  • Joyce and Madina combined for 49 points in the paint… made it look easy. Mizzou had no answer.
YMMV… forever to thee.
 
CW is Okot’s strong play since Norman has made her a lock to go pro, but wondering if the state of WNBA negotiations will lead her to return if we win the eligibility appeal.

A dream scenario of Kitts, Okot, AND Watkins back with Edwards, AT, and Tac would give us our deepest frontcourt yet.
 
Are Kitts and Edwards compatible on the court together, or do they both essentially fill the same role… a “scoring” big (versus a rebounding big)? And if not, who starts… Edwards or Kitts?

I’ve always thought that one of Dawn’s biggest challenges is keeping everyone content.
 
.-.
Are Kitts and Edwards compatible on the court together, or do they both essentially fill the same role… a “scoring” big (versus a rebounding big)? And if not, who starts… Edwards or Kitts?

I’ve always thought that one of Dawn’s biggest challenges is keeping everyone content.
Kitts can rebound at a pretty high level and has done so in important games including SEC and NCAA tournament games.
 
Are Kitts and Edwards compatible on the court together, or do they both essentially fill the same role… a “scoring” big (versus a rebounding big)? And if not, who starts… Edwards or Kitts?

I’ve always thought that one of Dawn’s biggest challenges is keeping everyone content.
Kitts and Edwards co-existed on team USA and last season but throwing Watkins and Tournebize into the mix (haven't even talked about the incoming freshmen) would tax anyone.

Almost have to pay a lot of big lineups to make this work.
 
Last edited:
Are Kitts and Edwards compatible on the court together, or do they both essentially fill the same role… a “scoring” big (versus a rebounding big)?
Chloe is a better rebounder (at least per the numbers), but she never started alongside a rebounding machine like Madina Okot. Kamilla was not the rebounder that Madina is. She's not a scorer, which Joyce clearly is.

No matter how many bigs South Carolina has next season, only one of them will be a scoring big (Chloe has played two full seasons and isn't close to 1000 points while Joyce has 1100 points in nearly two full seasons).

And if not, who starts… Edwards or Kitts?
Joyce is likely to be named an All-American. With Ta'Niya gone, she's the only returning scorer. She will start. Chloe will either come off the bench in a sixth woman role or start in a big line-up scenario. She's going to have to get in where she fits in and do so while coming off a significant injury.

I’ve always thought that one of Dawn’s biggest challenges is keeping everyone content.
Dawn has chosen this path, so she's got to make it work. The game is changing (with NIL and the transfer portal), so I'm less convinced that it will work. The truth is that if a player misses significant time and isn't a JuJu-level player, that player will find herself fighting for minutes once she's healthy enough to return.
 
Last edited:
Chloe is a better rebounder (at least per the numbers), but she never started alongside a rebounding machine like Madina Okot. Kamilla was not the rebounder that Madina is. She's not a scorer, which Joyce clearly is.

No matter how many bigs South Carolina has next season, only one of them will be a scoring big (Chloe has played two full seasons and isn't close to 1000 points while Joyce has 1100 points in nearly two full seasons).


Joyce is likely to be named an All-American. With Ta'Niya gone, she's the only returning scorer. She will start. Chloe will either come off the bench in a sixth woman role or start in a big line-up scenario. She's going to have to get in where she fits in and do so while coming off a significant injury.


Dawn has chosen this path, so she's got to make it work. The game is changing (with NIL and the transfer portal), so I'm less convinced that it will work. The truth is that if a player misses significant time and isn't a JuJu-level player, that player will find herself fighting for minutes once she's healthy enough to return.
These are my thoughts as well. I expect Kitts to be the first off the bench while she is recovering and then the coaches will determine who gets the more minutes between all the bigs based on who are performing better for that particular game. I also halfway wonder if Tournabize will start over Watkins. I think it'll just depend on how much practice/conditioning Watkins did on her own this past year. Plus, we'll have Tac and the two freshmen backing up those four, though I kind of expect both freshmen bigs to redshirt if they're still recovering from their high school injuries.

This is how I see things playing out...

5) Tournabize/Watkins, Tac, Andrews
4) Edwards, Kitts, Watkins, Wynn
 
These are my thoughts as well. I expect Kitts to be the first off the bench while she is recovering and then the coaches will determine who gets the more minutes between all the bigs based on who are performing better for that particular game. I also halfway wonder if Tournabize will start over Watkins. I think it'll just depend on how much practice/conditioning Watkins did on her own this past year. Plus, we'll have Tac and the two freshmen backing up those four, though I kind of expect both freshmen bigs to redshirt if they're still recovering from their high school injuries.

This is how I see things playing out...

5) Tournabize/Watkins, Tac, Andrews
4) Edwards, Kitts, Watkins, Wynn
If Okot moves on to the WNBA, I would start Tournebize. I would want Dawn to take advantage of her upside (and height). We all have an idea of what Ashlyn can do.
 
When we lost Watkins, and then Kitts, to injury, my immediate concern was that this would be a rebuilding year. Yet here we are, ranked in the top 5 all year long, SEC regular season champs (again), looking to be a 1 seed in the Big Dance.
Even losing three starters from this year’s squad going into next year, I’m not as concerned this time. Adjustments were made, and will be made. I chalk this up to great coaching and recruiting players from both the portal and high school who have talent without entitlement. Latson is the textbook example.
 
.-.
When we lost Watkins, and then Kitts, to injury, my immediate concern was that this would be a rebuilding year. Yet here we are, ranked in the top 5 all year long, SEC regular season champs (again), looking to be a 1 seed in the Big Dance.
Even losing three starters from this year’s squad going into next year, I’m not as concerned this time. Adjustments were made, and will be made. I chalk this up to great coaching and recruiting players from both the portal and high school who have talent without entitlement. Latson is the textbook example.
My only concern (and it's getting slighter the more that I think about it) would be backcourt/perimeter production, but I would imagine that Tessa will ascend to All-America status (playing alongside a pass-first guard like Mouse) and that Joyce will spend a healthy amount of her minutes on the perimeter as part of a big line-up.
 
If Okot moves on to the WNBA, I would start Tournebize. I would want Dawn to take advantage of her upside (and height). We all have an idea of what Ashlyn can do.
She should play the best player and comparing Watkins' last season and Tournebize so far isn't remotely close.

If Tournebize has a massive offseason or Watkins isn't the same, then it might be close.

You are risking something when you have a whole roster making sacrifices and you play players because of upside.

Dawn has literally never done that. Veterans get treated with deference unless they're just beaten out. Granted her veterans generally are predictable about doing their job.
 
I remember reading how displeased SC fans were with Raven. They complained about her defense and lack of offense. It surprised me because I saw her play in high school and thought she was going to be super in college. After watching her play I thought the complaints were valid. However, she is now playing as well as thought she would. As far as holding her own against Fudd, did she do that last season?

Bad take--Raven barely guarded Fudd last season in both games. I hope Dawn would make the change this year since I don't think Tessa is quick enough to guard her and I don't think Latson is long enough. Raven's only 5-9 but has a 6-2 wing span and is a lockdown defender. I'm not sure if she'll shut down Fudd but she's the best option on South Carolina's roster and has shutdown great players throughout her career. I've also never heard anyone complain about her defense. That's always been her calling card.

I haven't heard an inkling of South Carolina fans being disappointed with her during her career. I feel like if anything, it's the complete opposite and she's one of the most beloved players in school history. She came back from injury her freshman year and consistently played well in big games (great showings against LSU, Iowa and UCONN as a freshman). I think a lot of the fan base has a soft spot for her after the Caitlin Clark wave off since she was the punching bag for South Carolina's lack of 3pt shooting, but most fans recognized that Raven shot quite well that game (3-6 from 3). Her sophomore year she was a fan favorite and instrumental to their undefeated run. She struggled last year but there was no question she gave it her all. This year she's been terrific. Dawn's always spoken highly of her.
 
I was curious. Raven had Fudd for about the first five minutes of the game and Fudd scored on one extended switch. Through the mid 3Q in not sure anyone who Raven was the established defender scored.

Raven kept us in the game in first half on the boards, seemed run down in second half. Did not convert a lot offensively so hopefully that changes.

Raven and Kitts played well but Kitts wasn't near big enough to defend strong. Feagin was pretty decent.

Fulwiley was awful. Pao was ineffective. Edwards and Tessa were on roller skates. N

Really could not defend the double screen on the curl.

Overall thoughts: we were the smaller team. We were sloppy. Offensively just not much going on.

I am pretty excited about replacing some of this season's bench minutes with Kitts and Watkins. Chloe just has nice offensive game.
General though: Raven, Tessa, and Joyce are better versions of themselves. We did not have Okot and I still hold hope that Latson can have some big moments.

Take Bueckers away and give SC I think a more realistic chance to keep pace and could be fun. Her whoops shows the gap haven't narrowed quite a bit, but matchups make fights so we will see. Maybe. We might not get there.
.
 
She should play the best player and comparing Watkins' last season and Tournebize so far isn't remotely close.

If Tournebize has a massive offseason or Watkins isn't the same, then it might be close.

You are risking something when you have a whole roster making sacrifices and you play players because of upside.

Dawn has literally never done that. Veterans get treated with deference unless they're just beaten out. Granted her veterans generally are predictable about doing their job.
It's 2026, not 2024. Move forward. Don't live in the past.

Players coming off of serious knee injuries don't just return as if nothing happened. They struggle, both physically and mentally. There's an adjustment period that takes place to get the player back to where she was prior to the injury. That can take up to two years post-injury.

If Alicia proves that she's better for the spot in 2026-27, then the spot should be hers. I don't care what Ashlyn was in the past. I care about what she is now. And if it's not better than Tournebize after a postseason and offseason in the system, then she should be the one coming off the bench. I do not give a damn about seniority.
 
I haven't heard an inkling of South Carolina fans being disappointed with her during her career. I feel like if anything, it's the complete opposite and she's one of the most beloved players in school history. She came back from injury her freshman year and consistently played well in big games (great showings against LSU, Iowa and UCONN as a freshman). I think a lot of the fan base has a soft spot for her after the Caitlin Clark wave off since she was the punching bag for South Carolina's lack of 3pt shooting, but most fans recognized that Raven shot quite well that game (3-6 from 3). Her sophomore year she was a fan favorite and instrumental to their undefeated run. She struggled last year but there was no question she gave it her all. This year she's been terrific. Dawn's always spoken highly of her.
This is the truth. Raven is beloved by the fanbase because we've had to shield her from excessive and unnecessary criticism due to a dismissive hand wave. Imagine a freshman being subjected to that kind of abuse. She was catching hell from rival fans and the media alike. This is the first year that they've realized their error and have course corrected.
 
.-.
It's 2026, not 2024. Move forward. Don't live in the past.

Players coming off of serious knee injuries don't just return as if nothing happened. They struggle, both physically and mentally. There's an adjustment period that takes place to get the player back to where she was prior to the injury. That can take up to two years post-injury.

If Alicia proves that she's better for the spot in 2026-27, then the spot should be hers. I don't care what Ashlyn was in the past. I care about what she is now. And if it's not better than Tournebize after a postseason and offseason in the system, then she should be the one coming off the bench. I do not give a damn about seniority.
Well I said play the best player. You said play the upside. Seems like you probably agree with play the best player.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
167,723
Messages
4,536,377
Members
10,412
Latest member
RusS


Top Bottom