Game Recap | The Boneyard

Game Recap

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,381
Reaction Score
23,714
Twelve games into the Kevin Ollie era, and he already has three wins over BCS opponents. The most optimistic of us couldn't have expected more than ten wins with a rookie coach, and seemingly no viable front court options. I was one of the few who defended the one year contract - I thought Ollie was a promising young coach, but I wanted to see him earn the job by first hitting a few check marks that every decent young coach should show right away. Even before tonight, I think most of us agreed that he had passed every one of his tests and earned the job. There just isn't a lot not to like - he's second to none in terms of NBA connections, he's never said anything that makes you scratch your head, and he's a young, energetic man with UConn in his blood who won't bolt at first opportunity. Basically, I just wanted to make sure he didn't his pants when it was actually time to play.

As for this game, you could describe it as ugly, or you could describe it as gritty. I'm sure most of us will choose to view the game in a more positive light, but a neutral bystander probably would have watched a few minutes and changed the channel. You take every win you can get and you don't complain, but it's clear this team still has a ways to progress before becoming a good team. The 10-2 represents a stepping stone, it does not, however, based on watching this team play, indicate how good this team is right now.

I'll start with the positives: defensively, this team played about as they have all year, as many in the game thread alluded to. Sure, part of it was Washington's offensive incompetance, but holding any team to under 30% from the field is pretty damn impressive. From a pure intensity standpoint, this UConn team is heads and shoulders above last years group. They are up in the ball-handlers face every possesion, they close out hard (even though they were bitten by the pump fake a couple times tonight), and there is rarely a ball rolling loose on the floor that a couple guys aren't diving for. This is the least talented UConn team we've seen in years, but they fight every possession, and that's why they're 10-2. They'll make some plays where you shake your head, but they don't dwell on it.

Surprisngly, we only lost the rebounding battle by three tonight, which can be attributed to the one and only Enosch Wolf. This is the second game this season, with the Wake Forest game being the other, where I'm not sure we win without his contributions. He also obviously played extremely well in a losing cause against N.C. State. Not only did he grab nine boards in just 17 minutes, he was also a force in the paint - he provided no breathing room for Washington's big man to get a clean look off, and he discrouaged several Washington guards from penetrating the lane. Even more encouraging, is the fact that Wolf has played well against stiffer competition, more than holding his own against N.C. State, and doubtlessly outplaying the frontcourt players of Washington. I can't say I'm gleeful at the prospect of Olander, Daniels, and Wolf holding down the fort against Louisville and Syracuse, but the kid is seven feet, he can move, and he has soft hands, which is more than we could have hoped for before the year.

The most concerning part of tonight's game, was the half-court offense. Now, if Ollie can replicate the Calhoun blue-print, this program will be in good shape, but one area I'd hope for a little more originality is in the half-court offense. As many here can attest to, Calhoun's half-court offense in his later years at UConn were stale to say the least from time to time. It often involved a guard trying to drill a hole into the court with the basketball, then a big man half-heartedly popping up to set a screen with ten secodns left on the shot clock as the other three guys stood around. The half-court sets started to get a little more intricate in the latter part of the 2010-11 season, but the 2009-10 and 2011-12 teams vastly under-achieved, due in large part to the half-court offense.

What I saw tonight was all to similar to those images of the last couple years. Sure, there were a couple of solid sets in there, but for the most part the offense was stagnant, and unimaginative. There needs to be more fluidity in the offense, especially among the guards. I'm seeing too much one on one play from the guards, and more than anything, too much dribbling. For a half-court offense to maximize efficiency, there needs to be a lot of ball movement from side to side, and in and out. Granted, we're likely never going to get much production from the post, but our most used lineups often consist of Boatright, Napier, two of Giffey, Daniels, and Calhoun, and then Olander or Wolf. Four of those guys have the capability of knocking down the three, and all of them can hit the mid-range shot. I'm a little disappointed that this team hasn't been a little bit more crisp on offense this season. I think we need to spread things out more, allow Boatright and Napier to attack WITHOUT ball screens, and move the ball from side to side on the perimeter until somebody finds some day light. I'm not expecting the Suns circa 2006, but we have the pieces to have a more effective half-court offense than what we've seen so far, IMO.

Player notes:

Boatright/Napier - I blended these two into one, simply because these two seem to feed off each other so much. Right now it's a bit too much of a "your turn, my turn" dynamic than a well-oiled unit. They had something going there in the second half with the backdoor cuts, but they need to find an alternative when that's not there. Tonight I thought it was a little too much Shabazz, and not enough Boatright. Shabazz's contributions on the glass we're invaluable (8 rebounds), but other than that I do not think he played a good game. He made some uncharacteristic decisions in transitiion, barreling to the basket when there was nothing there, and firing the ball over teammates heads. He had seven turnovers tonight, and most of them were simply dumb decisions. He's been great this season, but we need much better ball secruity from our Junior captain if we're going to go into Milwaukee Tuesday and come away with a victory. I'd like to see more off-ball action from both of them, much like what we saw from Kemba a couple years ago.

Giffey - It was a very typical Giffey night. He did a lot of good things out there, mixing it up on the glass, defending well, and moving the ball around the perimeter. He has as good a basketball IQ as anybody on the roster, IMO. He understands his role on the team, and he executes it perfectly. My biggest beef with Giffey, as always, is his reluctance to shoot. He has arguably the smoothest stroke on the team, and he has a decent handle. Why he doesn't go inside more and show off his turnaround, I have no idea.

Evans - R.J. is just a worker out there. He doesn't have a lot of natural basketball talent, but he's a gym rat and he uses his build to his advantage. I really wish we had him back for one more year.

Daniels - I agree with what upstater wrote in the game thread in regards to Daniels' mid-range game. He looks much more comfortable out there offensively with every game, and at this point he's become somewhat of a reliable offensive option. It's kind of unfair that he's playing out of position, because he lacks the bulk to bang around much in the paint. Hopefully he's ok and ready to go Tuesday because we'll need him. That was a nasty hit he took near the end.

Calhoun - I still don't feel comfortable when the ball is in his hands, and his three point shot is out of whack, but every time you look at the box score, you see Calhoun is in double figures. He'll get you a quiet 10-14 points a night, much like Lamb at the begginning of his surge during his freshman year. If the three starts to fall for him he'll be very dangerous in conference play.

Nolan - Loved what I saw from Nolan tonight. He hit three of four at the line, played some tough defense, and provided the interior activity that we need every once in a while. All we need from Nolan at this point is 5-10 minutes a game of relentless work on the glass and running of the floor in transition.

Olander - This kid needs to shoot layups and hook shots with his right hand until he can't feel it anymore. He works his ass off out there, but it's frustrating to see how limited he is with his right - he could actually be a threat on offense if he had one.

After all the this program has been dragged through in the last twelve months, this is a day that has to make you smile as a UConn fan. We've now got some stability at head coach, which is the most important thing for a program to have. I'm ready for Big East play, maybe for the last time.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
5,336
Reaction Score
13,361
We actually won the rebounding battle 40-36 but otherwise a great post!
 

CTBasketball

Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
9,989
Reaction Score
33,629
We need Enosch to be more consistent. I can see him averaging double digit rebounds if he plays hard all the time.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,812
Reaction Score
26,297
I have been impressed with Enosch's atheletic ability and soft hands. He caught a few passes tonight from Shabazz that really impressed me. i also loved his emotion on the floor, waving his hands to stir the crowd during a time out......but Ollie's reaction was even better. He was going nuts on the sideline imploring him to stop that s&*t!
 

The Funster

What?
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,949
Reaction Score
8,647
I thought KO could have called some TO when the offense was stagnating. The back cuts were working and then there were periods where the team was too content to settle for one on ones. Call a TO, emphasize movement and teamwork, send them back out. Wolf played big. The perimeter D was very active and the team squelched a very productive back court. There were some real nice takeaways from this game.
 

RichZ

Fort the ead!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,278
Reaction Score
22,469
Nicely thought out post. Only a couple disagreements from the couch in front of my TV.

My biggest beef with Giffey, as always, is his reluctance to shoot. He has arguably the smoothest stroke on the team, and he has a decent handle. Why he doesn't go inside more and show off his turnaround, I have no idea.

To me, his biggest weaknesses are his indecision with the ball in a passing situation (results in too many telegraphed passes) and his handle. He's got a horrible handle in traffic. Driving into traffic is the last thing I want to see him do.

Evans - R.J. is just a worker out there. He doesn't have a lot of natural basketball talent, but he's a gym rat and he uses his build to his advantage.

I think you underestimate his talent level. Last night he made a couple of moves that could only be described as finesse moves. NOT the guy bulling his way to the rim that we saw earlier in the season. I'm as impressed with his talent and b-ball savy as with his determination and power.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,837
Reaction Score
98,401
Good post 99and04...........as everyone said Enosch was the difference I believe.......he worked hard, he dove, he boxed out, he showed tremendous hands, altered shots, stayed straight up on smaller guys instead of jumping therefore getting a foul call and what doesn't go in the box score besides the 9 rebounds were the one's he kept alive which ultimately became Huskies possession........he was very good last night........

Funny play was the great hands on a tough squeeze pass by Bazz which he missed a shot, a tough shot, then banged in for his own rebound and tried to throw a 90MPH pass to Bazz who was 3 feet away....relax EW it's not a hot potato.......he was the key!
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,467
Reaction Score
37,126
The lame half-court offense is the one aspect of these first 12 games that concerns me about KO. For a former point guard, and an intelligent one at that, he seems disappointingly content to run JC's "impose your will, without any particular purpose" mode of offense.

I'm not expecting the sophistication of a Georgetown offense, but we have to be able to produce more than a late-shot-clock dribble-drive and a contested jump shot.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
1,582
Reaction Score
1,846
The lame half-court offense is the one aspect of these first 12 games that concerns me about KO. For a former point guard, and an intelligent one at that, he seems disappointingly content to run JC's "impose your will, without any particular purpose" mode of offense.

I'm not expecting the sophistication of a Georgetown offense, but we have to be able to produce more than a late-shot-clock dribble-drive and a contested jump shot.

Same here. But I've heard KO on a few occasions mention that the team needs to run its offense much better, so it seems he also wants to see a much better half-court offense. He just needs to demand it more from his players during games by calling out plays or timeouts to setup plays. That is one thing I don't see KO doing - at least from my TV vantage point.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,090
Reaction Score
6,342
Do not want Georgetown type offense. The team that is 202 in scoring in NCAA and got 37 pts against Tenn and 46 against a 5-8 Towson who gave up 75 to the College of Charlston.
KO runs an offense. JC's later problem with offense was barring a "Kemba" who could make even an AO and Chuck servicable; the front courts at Uconn since Okafor have been poor catchers/passers/shooters but good bangers. Boone is out of NBA because of that, Jeff, Thabeet, AO, Andre have all been sturdy inside but low on skills to incorporate into an offense.
Current teams has reasonable catch and pass inside guys (Wolf and TO) and instead of banger at 4 have DD who maybe learning to have a better handle to be able to play as a 3 but has a great handle as a 4 if you compare him to Roscoe or Jeff or TO. This to me allows more ball movement and with high post plays gives opportunity for effective cuts and one on one plays. Half court bogs down when Bazz decides to not be aggressive or Giff just passes ball around or OC dribbles outside or Boat dribbles a lot without penetration. Part of it is these guys work very, very hard on defense and need a break (take a bit of it on offense).
Can not explain why some games Bazz looks like he passes up too many personal offensive opportunities and others he does more than is there. With two very undersized but quick guards, dribble penetration and shooting threes and mid range jumpers needs to be the offense and that's what I see. Seems like for periods (usually small periods) no one wants to be the guy making plays; could not understand why Bazz or Boat did not handle last 5 minutes of game better re dribbling/passing out of press; the Bazz pass backwards to DD seemed a poor decision and the Boat turnover at mid court looked like he didn't want to be the guy with the ball; and Giff dribbling at half court could see why he doesn't want to dribble.
Overall statement, see offense as doing a pretty good job of spreading floor and getting shots for a team with 2 well under 6 ft guards, a 6 ft 4 inch forward, a 180 lb power forward and a center with limited "banging" ability.
 

joober jones

Finally Non-Fat Guy
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
4,736
Reaction Score
9,654
Up until this season I thought Wolf would be the German MandelBrown. Being wrong never felt so good.
 

CTBasketball

Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
9,989
Reaction Score
33,629
I remember posting a couple days ago Wolf has the ability to get Big East All-Conference next year...it seems like that is an accurate statement if he can grab 9+ rebounds a night and pour in more than 10pts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
305
Guests online
2,560
Total visitors
2,865

Forum statistics

Threads
159,855
Messages
4,208,066
Members
10,076
Latest member
Mpjd2024


.
Top Bottom