- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction Score
- 6,257
I already quoted a price. "Reasonable."
FSU to the B1G?
- Thread starter junglehusky
- Start date
- Status
I already quoted a price. "Reasonable."
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 36,740
- Reaction Score
- 36,908
How much you got?
Dann
#4hunnid
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 9,901
- Reaction Score
- 7,182
whats reasonable? how about a bc tshirt? its got some rips in it and it will be a fight for me to take it out of the dog house in the yard but its got a acc logo on it and some ppl think thats valueable...
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction Score
- 6,257
Deal...but only if you throw in an iron-on "U" of the same font as the "B" and the "C." Ah what the heck, it doesn't have to be the same font. Why should the U fit in when BC doesn't?
Dann
#4hunnid
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 9,901
- Reaction Score
- 7,182
i have a sharpie. done deal. its as done of a deal as uva to the b10!
HuskyHawk
The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2011
- Messages
- 34,518
- Reaction Score
- 91,209
Colorado is growing much faster than any Northeast state. So is Kansas for that matter. The Northwast is waning, just like the great lakes region, if more slowly.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction Score
- 6,257
A sharpie? Sweet! It doesn't happen to come with a provenance showing Flipper signed something with it, does it?
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction Score
- 6,257
Rates of increase aren't as valuable as absolute amount of increase in this case. While the Front Range will grow by 45% (compared to the Northeast's 17%) over the period from 2000 to 2025, that 45% represents only an additional 2.1 million viewers, whereas the Northeast's 17% equals 8.5 million. Which do you think the B1G would prefer, 2.1 or 8.5?
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2012
- Messages
- 8,902
- Reaction Score
- 26,528
I don't see it. ACC still gets $17 mn a year so it's not like Va Tech is lost. SEC might come calling too.
UNC is in a more difficult situation legislature-wise.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 36,740
- Reaction Score
- 36,908
You're slurring your typing.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction Score
- 6,257
The Va powers that be did, at one time, hold UVa's vote hostage on the original expansion to twelve teams until VaTech was included, the college athletics landscape is drastically different today than it was just a decade ago. I don't believe those couplings you cite make as much of a difference anymore. Would the state legislature seriously condemn BOTH of the premier sports universities to the future graveyard formerly known as the ACC just to keep both together? Are you saying that if given "Sophie's Choice" they would save neither? Oh wait...I may have answered my own question. That's right, they're POLITICIANS so I get where you're coming from.
Seriously, UVa to the B1G and Tech to the SEC is what's best for the schools and the state. As for Carolina, one will be going to the SEC and the other to the B12 with the remnants of the ACC. Is UNC willing to die on Duke's sword?
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction Score
- 6,257
- Status