- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 29,364
- Reaction Score
- 82,792
franfraschilla Fran FraschillaI'm excited to see the defending national champions practice today. On my way to UConn to see Kevin Ollie and the Huskies.
--from his twitter.
franfraschilla Fran FraschillaCan he post any direct observations? When Rothstein sat in on a practice I don't think he was able to.
Rothstein tweeted observations like a fiend when he was there.Can he post any direct observations? When Rothstein sat in on a practice I don't think he was able to.
franfraschilla Fran Fraschilla
I'm excited to see the defending national champions practice today. On my way to UConn to see Kevin Ollie and the Huskies.
--from his twitter.
This happens because the media are allowed at practice, all at once, at very specific times (usually the day before a game) to watch practice and then get their quotes from players and coaches for their game day articles and whatever else they are working on.Sweet. Hopefully he feeds us a Sunday dinner, I'm hungry to hear anything of substance coming from the practices.
By the way...has anyone else noticed that when the Hartford Courant does a story on, lets say Omar Calhoun, that the CT Post does one the same day or one day later. And vice-versa?
The local newspaper press seem have some undercover agreement where each reporter takes a turn writing a story, and everyone else plagiarizes it.
This happens because the media are allowed at practice, all at once, at very specific times (usually the day before a game) to watch practice and then get their quotes from players and coaches for their game day articles and whatever else they are working on.
The media are given three or four players sporadically after practice to speak with and get quotes. They all huddle around the player with their recorders going asking questions, so they all end up getting the same quotes, therefor, similar stories.
There are some pretty simple ways to get some exclusive quotes, but most of the writers don't really care, or put any thought into that, unless they are writing a big feature article, then you can request time alone to speak with a specific player or coach so your story doesn't get scooped and so you have more time to get your info.
Even taking what you said into account, why is it that they all write about the same player when three or four are available? And not only do they write about the same player, but if you compare the articles side by side, the story line is the same and even some of the wording.
Just my opinion, but I don't think it's a coincidence. I think they know that people don't usually read more than one newspaper. So, they share the load where three of them take the day off and one writes, and they pass the finished article around. Then it's the next guy's turn.
franfraschilla Fran FraschillaSo not only are our beat writers lazy but they're in some sort of plagiarism conspiracy.Even taking what you said into account, why is it that they all write about the same player when three or four are available? And not only do they write about the same player, but if you compare the articles side by side, the story line is the same and even some of the wording.
Just my opinion, but I don't think it's a coincidence. I think they know that people don't usually read more than one newspaper. So, they share the load where three of them take the day off and one writes, and they pass the finished article around. Then it's the next guy's turn.
I like that our coach coaches every day, are there coaches who dont?
The guy before explained how this works. It's really not complicated. And there are only so many players and only so many ways to describe what's happening.
But we don't have any players from Latvia for him to rave about.

My opinion; you don't get a lot of great quotes from players in these situations. Usually you end up getting one glaring storyline from a few good quotes from one player and/or a coach and everyone runs with it and ends up writing something very similar. At least that's the way it was when I was covering the team. I haven't kept up with the horde much lately, so it's possible some guys are sharing stories, but very similar articles were produced frequently just because of the scenario I mentioned above back in my day, not too long ago.Even taking what you said into account, why is it that they all write about the same player when three or four are available? And not only do they write about the same player, but if you compare the articles side by side, the story line is the same and even some of the wording.
Just my opinion, but I don't think it's a coincidence. I think they know that people don't usually read more than one newspaper. So, they share the load where three of them take the day off and one writes, and they pass the finished article around. Then it's the next guy's turn.
Funny that you mentioned Latvia. My Great Grandfather was Born there.
I get weird reactions, when i tell people i am Latvian![]()
It is pretty simple if you understand the process. Three or four players are made available, they trickle into the media room. First player comes in, everyone crowds around him with recorders, a few questions are asked. Next player comes in, everyone sees him come through, runs over to him, a bunch of questions are asked. Etc. they go with the best storyline.I guess you're right, it's really not that complicated. Let me see if I got understand what you two are saying ...Only 4 players are made available to the press after a practice. So the beat writers have no choice but to pick out the same player, write the same story, and publish that same story in 4 different newspapers. Then..let's see, they go home for a week. Go up to Storrs. Repeat. You're right, that's not complicated to understand at all, thanks!
Your theory is that in a tiny state with thousands of UConn fans that a years-long fraud has been perpetrated and it all hinges on the idea that no one, anywhere, would ever read more than one of the newspapers and catch on to this scheme. You're in a great position here.I guess you're right, it's really not that complicated. Let me see if I got understand what you two are saying ...Only 4 players are made available to the press after a practice. So the beat writers have no choice but to pick out the same player, write the same story, and publish that same story in 4 different newspapers. Then..let's see, they go home for a week. Go up to Storrs. Repeat. You're right, that's not complicated to understand at all, thanks!
I really enjoyed this. Nice work.Your theory is that in a tiny state with thousands of UConn fans that a years-long fraud has been perpetrated and it all hinges on the idea that no one, anywhere, would ever read more than one of the newspapers and catch on to this scheme. You're in a great position here.
It is pretty simple if you understand the process. Three or four players are made available, they trickle into the media room. First player comes in, everyone crowds around him with recorders, a few questions are asked. Next player comes in, everyone sees him come through, runs over to him, a bunch of questions are asked. Etc. they go with the best storyline.
Maybe a coach mentions that Amida is much better with his midrange shot, the horde ask Amida a few questions based on that, and boom, everyone uses the same quotes and the story pretty much writes itself. The beat writers dont care if their stories are similar. There is a bit of a different process if you are writing a big feature, or want to write something exclusive. You can request time with a specific player or coach for an important feature so others dont scoop your story.
Wait, are you Dr. Doom?Funny that you mentioned Latvia. My Great Grandfather was Born there.
I get weird reactions, when i tell people i am Latvian![]()