The problem with the french is that their strengths math up with ours...and we have better players.
I was thinking the same thing. Sure Tina and Ashja played huge defense in the 2nd half, but the Aussie's strentgh clearly is their post. I think France is a much more balanced team, like the USA, and I'm betting we beat France by more than we beat Australia.
Reason being, as you said, their team genetics are more similar to ours and I agree our players are just better. I have no idea how to do any kind of player v. player analysis, but they only beat Canada by 4, Austraila by 4 in OT, and the Czech Republic by 3.
They only have 6 players who have averaged more than 4 PPG unlike team USA who has 10. Their biggest player is 6'4" Gruda who does not appear to be the equal of either Tina or Sylvia. At 6'3", Yacoubou could pose some matchup problems - if Parker isn't up for the challenge, perhaps Jones would be. Thier guards are 5'5", 5'7", and 5'10". I think Miyem is a wing at 6'2".
On paper, I just don't see how they match up against Team USA. To compare the common opponents, Team USA beat Canada by 43, Australia by 13, and Czech Republic by 27. One other thing that really stands our is the USA is averaging over 23 assists per game to France's 13.4. That means to me that the French play a lot more 1 on 1. I don't doubt the US coaches are looking at that to figure out the best way to slow the French offense.