Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="AZHuskiePop, post: 4916509, member: 1609"] That’s irrelevant to my point which is: There is precedent is for a bigger conference getting more bids it’s almost inevitable. as the PAC who averaged 4 goes out of existence. 80% of the conferences are 1 bid which won’t change so their 4 or 5 bids will most likely go to Big 12 and B1G. almost by default. Yes the ACC expanded to 15 teams by raiding the old Big East and got 9 in twice . They picked up 2 over their previous high. If basketball hadn’t tanked in the ACC they could easily get 10. So if the number of power teams is really unchanged why the pressing need to expand the tournament. That’s simply BS Im on record as saying the NCAA pool is a disgrace and participants should get a bigger share . That helps both the bigger and smaller conferences but by a percentage of revenue increase it helps the smaller conferences compete. [/QUOTE]