Fourth down and a foot call in 4th quarter | The Boneyard
.-.

Fourth down and a foot call in 4th quarter

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
217
Reaction Score
1,324
4th and actually less than a foot call in fourth quarter to go and Disco goes for 42 yard field goal into the wind. I say you have to go for it there given the yardage and the kick being into the wind.
 
diaco/verducci basically told the line and the offense they were a bunch of p**ss*s. Sherriffs had 465 yards total offense but wasn't trusted to get one when it counted. smh
 
4th and actually less than a foot call in fourth quarter to go and Disco goes for 42 yard field goal into the wind. I say you have to go for it there given the yardage and the kick being into the wind.


I didn't mind the call or the execution. Ball hit upright with plenty of leg and the kick missed by 6". Diaco knows Puyol has a 50 yard leg in no-wind conditions.
 
diaco/verducci basically told the line and the offense they were a bunch of p**ss*s. Sherriffs had 465 yards total offense but wasn't trusted to get one when it counted. smh

How'd it work the other times they've tried it this year? Second guessed either way.
 
diaco/verducci basically told the line and the offense they were a bunch of p**ss*s. Sherriffs had 465 yards total offense but wasn't trusted to get one when it counted. smh


Or, the OLine told Diaco/Verducci they can't be counted on to drive the pile a foot after failing to do it earlier in the game.
 
.-.
How'd it work the other times they've tried it this year?

so you agree w/kicking FG into wind? how about throwing a jump ball to the end zone or, better, inside the 20? an int is better result than what a missed FG resulted in
 
I didn't mind the call or the execution. Ball hit upright with plenty of leg and the kick missed by 6". Diaco knows Puyol has a 50 yard leg in no-wind conditions.

Wasn't no-wind conditions, tho.
 
so you agree w/kicking FG into wind? how about throwing a jump ball to the end zone or, better, inside the 20? an int is better result than what a missed FG resulted in

Second guessed either way...

Of late I'm of the mindset to take the points. He had plenty of leg on that kick unfortunately 6 inches to the right and doinked.
 
They should have kicked it in the 1st Q and run a sneak in the 4th. The first time was 1.5 yards. It wasn't going to work. The second time was .5 yds. Then to top it off we run out of time at the end of the half. Just stupid.
 
How'd it work the other times they've tried it this year? Second guessed either way.

Yeah, I know they got stuffed the first time. The point is in game 7 try something else besides the sneak you've tried in the previous six games in that situation.
 
Yeah, I know they got stuffed the first time. The point is in game 7 try something else besides the sneak you've tried in the previous six games in that situation.

and last game (but won't argue against trying something other than QB sneak).
 
.-.
Wasn't no-wind conditions, tho.

No kidding. My point was that he had plenty of leg and height going in to the wind at 44 yards that 50 yards in no-wind is a viable option.
 
That was a horrible call considering the score and the wind. No excuses for it. If the O line is problematic in those situations, create a play to overcome it--a play action --unexpected-- pass. Or a quick hit by Max, who can push better than BS.
 
No kidding. My point was that he had plenty of leg and height going in to the wind at 44 yards that 50 yards in no-wind is a viable option.

My bad. With no wind or wind at his back kicking FG there is right decision. Was wrong call then. Should have kicked it in 1st quarter at that end of field.
 
Yeah, he gets second guessed either way. So what.

Wind at back you can kick there. But wind in face, down 8 in the 4th Q from inside their 30, I thought going for it was the higher percentage play. And it should have been a pass, play action or otherwise.
 
Yeah, he gets second guessed either way. So what.

Wind at back you can kick there. But wind in face, down 8 in the 4th Q from inside their 30, I thought going for it was the higher percentage play. And it should have been a pass, play action or otherwise.


We might have needed 2 timeouts to figure out the play call though.
 
Speaking of play action. Why do we PA on 3rd and long so,the QB has to scramble for his,life as soon as he turns to look downfield?

There are some real head scratchers.
 
.-.
Speaking of play action. Why do we PA on 3rd and long so,the QB has to scramble for his,life as soon as he turns to look downfield?

There are some real head scratchers.

We spend a lot of time on the Boneyard criticizing 50-50 to 60-40 play calls. But I know the play you are referring to, and it may have been the stupidest call I've ever seen. Who is biting on a play fake on 3rd and 6?
 
Yep. 3rd and 6 was the play. Not the first time this year and every time Bryant turns to see an oncoming rusher that disrupts the play.

Those are the route of plays this staff needs to learn to eliminate from the playbook. Stupid is the only thing it can be called.
 
We spend a lot of time on the Boneyard criticizing 50-50 to 60-40 play calls. But I know the play you are referring to, and it may have been the stupidest call I've ever seen. Who is biting on a play fake on 3rd and 6?

This started to bug me last game. By the time Bryant gets done with the fake and looks downfield a quick hitter for 7 yards is now covered. Today USF really snuffed out our passes to Arkeel in the flat and we kept trying to do it.
 
The problem with kicking that FG there was the way Shirreffs was able to move the ball himself leading up to that point of the game. On that drive and I believe the one before it, he was eating up massive chunks of yardage on his own. Why not let him continue when he only needed half a yard. No need to have him sneak it. Spread em out and have him run. Was working at that point of the game and instead, we kick into the wind. Even if he made it I would have disagreed with it. We needed to score a TD there. It was too late in the game for the "take the points" mentality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
504
Guests online
13,503
Total visitors
14,007

Forum statistics

Threads
165,383
Messages
4,434,269
Members
10,286
Latest member
John15:4


p
p
Top Bottom