- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 7,401
- Reaction Score
- 18,886
You are right it wasn't directed at you...per say.
I just think this guy's portrayal of the Joe Pa "kingdom" makes sense.
Why do you think all the people that knew of the "incident" kept quiet?
Could it be Joe Pa had everyone controlled in some way and if this came out, even right after it happened, it would destroy the man who "made PSU what it is" so it's protect Joe Pa at all costs?
You can't make believe an AD and VP did not care enough about child rape to call police. They just cared more about almighty Joe Pa and the almighty PSU. This is a case that borders on fear and brainwashing.
I just think this guy's portrayal of the Joe Pa "kingdom" makes sense.
Why do you think all the people that knew of the "incident" kept quiet?
Could it be Joe Pa had everyone controlled in some way and if this came out, even right after it happened, it would destroy the man who "made PSU what it is" so it's protect Joe Pa at all costs?
You can't make believe an AD and VP did not care enough about child rape to call police. They just cared more about almighty Joe Pa and the almighty PSU. This is a case that borders on fear and brainwashing.
FWIW, because I don't think that was directed at me, I am not doubting the credibility of the former assistant's statement. Just its importance.
Ultimately, JoePa acted illegally in covering up the rapes, or he didn't, and JoePa acted immorally in covering up the rapes, or he didn't. From what I've seen the answer is almost certainly "yes" to the latter question, but probably "no" to the former. But debates about "he is or he isn't" otherwise a good guy are utterly irrelevant to the questions at hand, and frankly not very important. Almost every human being on earth is a "good guy" greater than 0% of the time and less than 100% of the time. Anecdotes as to what that percentage is for anyone when you're really debating specific actions or inactions don't add anything.