Forget the "Who should start at QB" question...

[Alum86]

Who is/are our starting RBs ?
I have no idea who starts or gets majority of carries against UCF, and for the remainder of the season.

 

[SubbaBub]

I'd let the three freshmen take it for as long as they are effective. Pass protection and not fumbling take priority, though. I'd keep Newsome third right now until one of the other two, misses an assignment or puts it on the gound.

 

[Dooley]

Newsome's benching, I'm going to guess, has much more to do with his fumbling trends than anything related to his "lower body". Now that the message has been sent, I'd be surprised to see anyone other than Newsome or Johnson get the bulk of our carries for the remainder of this 2015 try-out season.

 

[Bonehead]

Newsome's benching, I'm going to guess, has much more to do with his fumbling trends than anything related to his "lower body". Now that the message has been sent, I'd be surprised to see anyone other than Newsome or Johnson get the bulk of our carries for the remainder of this 2015 try-out season.

'Reports are Newsome has a Boyle - I mean Boil - on his lower leg...'
JK

 

[Palatine]

Who is/are our starting RBs ?
I have no idea who starts or gets majority of carries against UCF, and for the remainder of the season.

The good news is that all the RBs have gotten a chance. The bad news is none of them has taken the job by the throat.

Newsome has proven to be both the most explosive and the most turn over prone. Johnson has shown to be the the most complete back. Max is the best short yardage runner. Marriner looks solid but a smaller version of Johnson.

If no one separates themselves, they all should play.

 

[gioff23]

johnson gets majority of carries; Newsome brought in for change of pace.

Max plays little until SMU game.

I'm looking for Marriner on the back of my milk carton