- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 9,329
- Reaction Score
- 31,086
We've heard the criticism. So for argument's sake, what would you like to see happen?
Should Nike modify it to make it "toupee-free" like Penfield's design? Or should they roll out a whole different logo concept (they must have other versions on the cutting room floor) and see what the public says then?
Or should UConn just go back to the familiar happy, all-white, furry, tongue-wagging Jonathan logo? And if so, do they keep all the secondary logos for their sports teams (block "C" for football, interlocking "UC" for men's hoops, ugly-@ss "C" interlocked with a basketball for women's hoops, etc.)? This rebranding was supposed to be about synchronizing the logo, fonts, & colors for all UConn athletic teams for marketing purposes. So, with enough public backlash, if they were to dump the new one, where should they go from here?
Should Nike modify it to make it "toupee-free" like Penfield's design? Or should they roll out a whole different logo concept (they must have other versions on the cutting room floor) and see what the public says then?
Or should UConn just go back to the familiar happy, all-white, furry, tongue-wagging Jonathan logo? And if so, do they keep all the secondary logos for their sports teams (block "C" for football, interlocking "UC" for men's hoops, ugly-@ss "C" interlocked with a basketball for women's hoops, etc.)? This rebranding was supposed to be about synchronizing the logo, fonts, & colors for all UConn athletic teams for marketing purposes. So, with enough public backlash, if they were to dump the new one, where should they go from here?