Inevitably, I have comments:
And I'm grateful
The sentence " The 2011 event, held in Phoenix, Arizona included 96 of the basketball programs in the country." in the TOC section appears to be missing at least one word somewhere.
Oddly, I "borrowed" that language from
an article on Breanna Stewart, but I see the same omission there, so I'll correct both.
It looks like you've reversed U18 & U19 in the 2nd & 3rd paragraphs of the USA basketball.
I don't think so. If you are thinking that the natural progression should be U16, U17,U 18 U19, well, that seems natural to me, but apparently not to USA Basketball.
Check out the graphic I created (I hope it is correct)
at Schedule. When they converted the Youth Development to U16 and U17, they did it in such a way that the flow isn't what I expected. That said, it may be deliberate, rather than happenstance. Is they followed the natural order, then consider two girls one year apart - one would always be naturally in the current year age group, while one would always be struggling for a spot on a team where many are a year older. The dissonance means that you'll be well suited for the 16/17 pair or the 18/19 pair, but not both, and, importantly, not neither.
Or perhaps all you meant was that I should discuss them in the natural order, rather than the chronological order?
Or maybe I missed something?
The mention of Moriah & Breanna in the 3rd graph of USA basketball doesn't really belong in an article on Morgan -- turns it into a UConn fan piece. Breanna's leadership of the C-NS team at the TOC likewise.
My mindset was to work on the second of three articles on the UConn frosh, but I agree with you, the article isn't about one of the three frosh, it is about Morgan. I made both changes