Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Florida State to sue ACC over GOR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="speckle, post: 5013282, member: 13335"] I consider the first part common knowledge. Unless they are playing each other, FSU and Clemson are at the top of the value-add column of every ACC football game. It's part of why they, with UNC, they voted 3-12 against adding the new teams. They also make up a significant proportion of the ACCs CFP pathway, definitely not 1/9th and possibly even the majority, and therefore represent a disproportionate amount of anticipated league revenue. Very simply, they're looking to stop subsidizing the rest of the league and capture their own market value. It's also why the ACC is fighting tooth and nail to keep them from leaving, bc the rest of the league would never get close to same payout without the FSU and Clemson games, ie disproportionate value. The game theory argument works perfectly as there would be significantly less risk associated with the majority of the league electing to amend the bylaws to facilitate a breakup. If you're following the disproportionate value explanation, you can't assume the Louisville, Miami, VT, etc. payouts would continue at their current or future expected rates, which would then make a Big12 membership slot more valuable assuming their current valuation as peers. Finally, while the P12s TV contract had entirely ended and that opened the door for a financially manageable conference exit, the $5m fee is on the books and sets a watermark for future school athletics valuations in legal arguments. When the ACCs contract ends at its original date in under 2 years, the league would be looking for a 20-30X multiple, which is the basis for the "punitive" exit fee argument. I believe there are just too many schools that are better off, sooner, for the ACC to survive much longer. Especially if those schools choose to work together. I'd expect the 12 to be actively involved in all ACC members other than Wake, BC, and maybe Syracuse and SMU. No idea about Cal and Stanford but I wouldn't rule them out of the 10. At some point the 10 will be able to self finance a stand alone network and ESPN/FOX/whomever will either have to pay up or gain a legit competitor. Watch the NCAA tournament on the B1G network lol. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
Florida State to sue ACC over GOR
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom