Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="FfldCntyFan, post: 4950776, member: 71"] If FSU's president signed the document, that he didn't meet with the BOT (even if this allegation is true), that in itself is nothing more than an issue between FSU and its then president. I'm curious as to what these "false representations" are. It would take quite a bit to a) prove this did actually happen and b) they materially changed the contract terms that were being agreed to. Prior to accepting that something "hinky" is going on, I would like to see evidence that signatories of the agreement were not given full opportunity to review the agreement (along with their own legal counsel) prior to signing. As far as the slow play on providing the entirety of the document, there is nothing abnormal here. It is obviously a document that initally all parties involved understood and accepted needed confidentiality. At the moment, at least one party would prefer that it no longer remain confidential. It is very likely that the ACC want more clarity on the language of keeping the contents confidential prior to releasing the entirety of the document. Things like this are very common. The bulk of this sounds like basic contract law. [/QUOTE]