Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="billybud, post: 4865133, member: 3850"] There was no way to discuss Raycom without bringing Swofford into the discussion. Maybe the FSU legal team didn't want to lead with that and maybe try to win the case without those dirty facts. But the ACC amended complaint changed all that. And ACC malfeasance, and now, possible corruption with Swofford forcing ESPN to include Raycom (and his son Chad) is a main point. It cost the conference millions. It's also interesting how this amended complaint makes it clear that it was Swofford pushing for the second GOR when everyone assumed that it was ESPN and that Swofford told members that ESPN had required the extension while they had not. The ACC has been messaged..."We will shoot back". My take is it is all about negotiating an exit...and probably before ACC and ESPN folks are deposed. But, at any rate...FSU seems to have the gun decks manned and looks determined to not strike the flag even if the decks are awash. [/QUOTE]