- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 2,290
- Reaction Score
- 6,022
Your own words contradict the very point you attempt to make. To begin with, the level of infuence in respect to players individual development in WCBB today has diminished in comparison to what it once was. There was a time when coaches and programs played a major part, but today most players come to college with much less upside left in respect to individual skills. They have already spent years training with personal coaches even before the hit high school. They play basketball year round. The days of a raw undeveloped athlete coming into a program is rare. Mostly post players and their ceiling is usually still physical development. The primary lesson left to learn is how to integrate their individual skill into the team concept. Geno stated that most players know how, they just need ot learn when.How would she not be better with better coaching and teammates?? It’s obvious she was waaayyy better than her HS ranking even before she stepped foot in Gainesville. She had a good showing in the JBC game and averaged nearly 15 ppg as a freshman. She scored 41 points and her team nearly won so of you don’t think she would be better then idk what to tell you. Nothing against Cam he has Florida looking much better but Briggs talent is what makes her stand out not his coaching...
What has also changed is the number of really good coaches and programs that are presently in WCBB. The days of a few good coaches inhabiting a field of poor to mediocre ones is a thing of the past. The increase in pay has drawn actual coaches to womens basketball as opposed to a field that was once inhabited purely by ex players. The belief that only the top programs have good coaches wishful thinking by those that follow those programs. That is heard entirely too much. The idea that players need to only go to select programs to help their development.
You statement that Briggs talent is what makes her stand out and not Cams coaching. If it applies to Briggs and Cam why wouldn't it apply as well to other players in other programs?. How much can be attributed to a players individual talent and how much to coaching? No one can really know, so it can be easily manipulated to promote a persons personal perspective. Cam has been elevating the program at Florida for multiple season now. You, and most of us really have no idea to what level he will eventually take that program. Many other coaches, who are now considered elite began the same way.
Ironically., you bring up the Arkansas program as an example of a better program for development. Neigbors has always just relied on his players individual skills. He basically just throws them the ball and says go to it. While I can agree that playing on a team with better player helps a player adjust better to the next level of play. At the next level it will be required to play more of team game, which has to be adjusted to if it is not engrained in college. However, Arkansas is not the program that instills team play. why don't you just be honest. You used Arkansas to avoid a homer label, but you actually meant SC as the program where she chould get better coaching. Its what UConn fans post all the time in respect to really good players who might not even have been recruited by their team.
Last edited: