fl cupcake schedule is humorous | The Boneyard

fl cupcake schedule is humorous

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

chapwilvaug72

Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
782
Reaction Score
758
anybody check it? they expect credit for these wins? . . . . here goes the joke: north fl (who are they?), ark. little pebble, southern, mid. tn, jacksonville, fres. state, savannah state, richmond, albany

real opponents: wi -6, memphis +2, fl state +1, ks +6, UCONN -1

sec: very weak with many squeakers
 
Kentucky and Tennessee were strong teams. Florida is for real. They play at a slow pace so they have low-scoring games that keep the score close, but they almost always win.
 
Last edited:
Doomed.png
 
Tennesse is good. Kentucky is good. Arkansas/UCLA are both relatively good as well. My point is, you cannot sleep on them. They're the #1 overall seed for a reason.
 
Hey don't call us a cupcake. If UConn is on anyone's schedule it makes up for everything else. Ask Harvard, Stanford, Maryland, Indiana and all the AAC teams. Whether NIT or NCAA selection committee playing against us is a major two thumbs up on other teams resume and added bonuses when evaluating.

You want proof? Hell, cuse lived off of UConn games all through the BE years, not scheduling any tough non-conference opponents.

We are UConn dammit!
 
.-.
They are really good. It is going to be hard for us to keep our bigs on the floor with their size. We have almost no chance whatsoever.

DOOMED!!!!!!
 
chapwilvaug72 said:
anybody check it? they expect credit for these wins? . . . . here goes the joke: north fl (who are they?), ark. little pebble, southern, mid. tn, jacksonville, fres. state, savannah state, richmond, albany

real opponents: wi -6, memphis +2, fl state +1, ks +6, UCONN -1

sec: very weak with many squeakers
Expand ...

Hey now, North Florida is my Alma Mater. Go Ospreys. :)
 
Last edited:
pj said:
Kentucky and Tennessee were strong teams. Florida is for real.
Expand ...

Were they? I'm not going to disagree that Tennessee had a surprising run in the tournament, but they were an 11 seed and I don't think many disagree that they were appropriately seeded.

UK is very talented and does seem to be clicking but the SEC championship aside, not sure they were a strong team the first two games. Erratic team full of potential, that they seem to be starting to realize.
 
caw said:
Were they? I'm not going to disagree that Tennessee had a surprising run in the tournament, but they were an 11 seed and I don't think many disagree that they were appropriately seeded.

UK is very talented and does seem to be clicking but the SEC championship aside, not sure they were a strong team the first two games. Erratic team full of potential, that they seem to be starting to realize.
Expand ...

Tennessee is #7 and Kentucky #8 in kenpom.com ratings. They were both ahead of UConn before the tourney started. The SEC was about as underseeded as the AAC.
 
We all know that Fla is for real, but I don't think it's a coincidence that the two best defensive teams they've played (us & Wisc) beat them. Their offense is definitely not at the same level as their D. Keep this game in the low 60's and I like our chances.
 
.-.
Conference affiliation is at the top of the list of the least effective ways of determining the quality of an opponent. Exhibit A would be the ACC, which received undue respect by the selection committee as the tournament proved. The SEC did not receive enough respect. W/L, RPI, Polls...they are indicators that should never be used individually.

Florida is for real.
 
pj said:
Tennessee is #7 and Kentucky #8 in kenpom.com ratings. They were both ahead of UConn before the tourney started. The SEC was about as underseeded as the AAC.
Expand ...

I like kenpom for some things when used with other stats but not for rankings. Tennessee never passed the eye test until the tournament. UK was obviously not meshing until late into the season.

Tennessee was 21-12 on the year including 3-1 in the tournament. They were barely in the tournament.
 
caw said:
Were they? I'm not going to disagree that Tennessee had a surprising run in the tournament, but they were an 11 seed and I don't think many disagree that they were appropriately seeded. UK is very talented and does seem to be clicking but the SEC championship aside, not sure they were a strong team the first two games. Erratic team full of potential, that they seem to be starting to realize.
Expand ...

If you are going to discount Tennessee then you should discount us. Tennessee had a worse regular season than us, but started playing excellent basketball at the right time ( sound familiar?)

They were appropriately seeded based on overall resume, doesn't mean they weren't a load to handle as they got better toward end if season.

Same with Kentucky obviously.

Florida, bottom weak SEC notwithstanding is the best team in the country. To try and say otherwise is disingenuous.
 
August_West said:
If you are going to discount Tennessee then you should discount us. Tennessee had a worse regular season than us, but started playing excellent basketball at the right time ( sound familiar?)

They were appropriately seeded based on overall resume, doesn't mean they weren't a load to handle as they got better toward end if season.

Same with Kentucky obviously.

Florida, bottom weak SEC notwithstanding is the best team in the country. To try and say otherwise is disingenuous.
Expand ...

There was a gulf a mile wide between UConn and Tennessee during the regular season. I agree that both have stepped up in the post season, but they were not a strong team during the regular season. They had 17 wins pre SECT. That is not a strong team.

UK had a very talented team that didn't start to gel until the end of the ear. The only game I would call them a strong team in was the SEC final. The other two they looked lost.

I still think UF is a very good team. That is undeniable. I also think WSU was a very strong team. Their records backup the eye test.

UConn definitely had its ups and downs but was still much stronger in the regular season than UT or UK.

Edit: BYW I never said UF wasn't the best team in the counrty, just disputing the idea that UK and UT were strong teams when UF beat them during the regular season.
 
caw said:
There was a gulf a mile wide between UConn and Tennessee during the regular season. I agree that both have stepped up in the post season, but they were not a strong team during the regular season. They had 17 wins pre SECT. That is not a strong team.

UK had a very talented team that didn't start to gel until the end of the ear. The only game I would call them a strong team in was the SEC final. The other two they looked lost.

I still think UF is a very good team. That is undeniable. I also think WSU was a very strong team. Their records backup the eye test.

UConn definitely had its ups and downs but was still much stronger in the regular season than UT or UK.

Edit: BYW I never said UF wasn't the best team in the counrty, just disputing the idea that UK and UT were strong teams when UF beat them during the regular season.
Expand ...

nah, Im sorry. That comment was meant toward the overall tone in the thread, not you personally (even though I quoted your post)
 
.-.
I F#&king hate this thread. Threads like this beg the mojo gods to screw us over. This is how Blake hit that shot in 2002 (he hits that once in 5,000 tries). This is why Marcus White's layup got stuck between the rim and backboard in 2003 (has anyone seen that happen before or since?).

The only thing to say is....






Doomed!
 
Last edited:
The fact there have been no UF trolls here means they are overconfident and are completely over looking us- just the way we like it. Unfortunately WE ARE DOOMED!!!!! And have no chance whatsoever.
 
.-.
One of the reasons the SEC only got three teams in the tournament was because Florida went 21-0 in the conference. Teams like Arkansas, Georgia, LSU, etc. were one win against Florida away from probably getting in. The SEC wasn't a bad conference, they just had one dominant team that made everybody else look bad. They've also won every tournament game by double digits. I know everybody considers Florid the tournament favorite, and they get a fair amount of respect, but I'm still not sure people understand how good they are. They lost two games this season. One of them was @ Wisconsin without Wilbekin and Finney-Smith. The other was @ UConn on a buzzer beater. When you look at this team, and how tough they are, and how many upperclassmen they've had that have come so close, they're really very reminiscent of our 1999 team. And if they win the whole thing, you're going to have to consider them in every "team of the decade" conversation.
 
MikeSol12 said:
Their schedule includes every other team in the final four. Real cupcake...
Expand ...

/Thread. 5 games against Final Four teams before the NCAA's.

Also Middle Tennessee was actually pretty good.
 
Scot-e said:
The fact there have been no UF trolls here means they are overconfident and are completely over looking us- just the way we like it. Unfortunately WE ARE DOOMED!!!!! And have no chance whatsoever.
Expand ...

Is it overconfidence? Or is it that nobody in Florida gives a shit about hoops? Truly strange we haven't had ANY fan interaction with Florida over here. Pretty pathetic actually.
 
Scot-e said:
The fact there have been no UF trolls here means they are overconfident and are completely over looking us- just the way we like it. Unfortunately WE ARE DOOMED!!!!! And have no chance whatsoever.
Expand ...

Over at gatorcountry they have a thread where they have pretty much declared they are the best bball program over the past decade, this century, and this millennium. They conveniently only started counting accomplishments starting in 2000.

There also another thread where someone did a detailed breakdown of the keys to the game and they predict Florida will win by 16 against the Huskies. =hey seem fairly confident and a little uniformed about the UConn team. Claiming the Huskies have limited depth and only go 6-7 deep so UF will wear them down and pull away.

However, there is one fan I saw who posted that he was somewhat worried as he expects it to be a close game and the Gators struggle from the line. Said if he was a betting man he would take UConn with 2 guards who shoot 80% at the line vs UF who shoot around 65%. Thinks this will be a game where the Gators FT shooting has an impact as a lot of the fan base has complained about their FT shooting all year yet it never really caused them to lose a game. That guy received multiple dislikes for that post.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,249
Messages
4,559,802
Members
10,448
Latest member
MillerLitEd


Top Bottom