Wow thats a real pisser
- 4 colonoscopies in the books for Deepster. Had difficulties with diverticulitis and eventually had 8 inches of colon removed. I had no problems with the prep or procedure of a colonoscopy and felt like a million bucks. Downed a full meatball grinder right after the last one.
- Also had a pilonidal cyst that someone mentioned above. Didn't go under for that one and actually had an epidural. So when women who've had an epidural complain about childbirth, I call BS. You could have busted my ankles Misery-style and I wouldn't have known.
- To try and really one-up the thread, I had issues with my bladder a couple years ago. Try being awake, with no anasthesia as they put a camera up the willy and into your bladder for a few minutes. Bladder cystoscopy.
The pilonidal cyst surgery wasn't the problem. They put me under and dug like a foot out of my body but what led up to it and after the surgery was awful. An open arse wound I had to pack for over a year before it healed.
The prep is the worst. I was so damn hungry, tired and felt miserable.Just finished. No significant issues. I do have some diverticulosis pockets. Dr said it's not much to worry about though. Pretty common.
The actual procedure was beyond trivial. I had more discomfort inserting the i.v. to administer the drugs
Great news."Count backwards from 100."
I got to 98, maybe.
Yeah, they told me to drink ginger ale to make the prep more palatable. It ruined ginger ale for me for a couple years.
@NDakotaHusky and others...
A super flukey backstory led to my first colonoscopy a few months before my 48th birthday. After the procedure, they said there were a couple more polyps found, they'd do biopsies, and call me later in the week.
4 or 5 days later, I got a call and someone from the office told me that one of the polyps was malignant, but was removed "with clean margins," and then bid me a good day.
Wait, what?!?!
I called the doctor, who told me that I'd been very fortunate that it was discovered & removed super early, and there was no followup necessary. I pressed him further. He said the only consequence was that going forward I'd have to answer, "Yes" if I was asked, "Have you ever had cancer?" And I had to have followup colonoscopy in 3 years, not 5.
Now I could lighten up, so I suggested that I could have had problems if I hadn't taken seriously the general advice to have a first colonoscopy at age 50. He chuckled and said," Oh no, you & I would have crossed paths before I turned 50. Yikes.
Dodged a bullet that hit me.
21 years later, I've been back to every 5 years for a few cycles.
But wait, there's more...
2010, and high PSA after an extended period without blood levels tested. The biopsy yielded one sample with a Gleason score troublesome for someone with as many years projected on my horizon. 12 years post-treatment, still no evidence of disease.
Sounds like moving the recommended age to 45 was a good idea for the medical industry. Also, very dodgy language used by your Drs. I would of wanted all the cancer screenings at that point. Prostate, liver, thyroid, hand, etc..."Count backwards from 100."
I got to 98, maybe.
Yeah, they told me to drink ginger ale to make the prep more palatable. It ruined ginger ale for me for a couple years.
@NDakotaHusky and others...
A super flukey backstory led to my first colonoscopy a few months before my 48th birthday. After the procedure, they said there were a couple more polyps found, they'd do biopsies, and call me later in the week.
4 or 5 days later, I got a call and someone from the office told me that one of the polyps was malignant, but was removed "with clean margins," and then bid me a good day.
Wait, what?!?!
I called the doctor, who told me that I'd been very fortunate that it was discovered & removed super early, and there was no followup necessary. I pressed him further. He said the only consequence was that going forward I'd have to answer, "Yes" if I was asked, "Have you ever had cancer?" And I had to have followup colonoscopy in 3 years, not 5.
Now I could lighten up, so I suggested that I could have had problems if I hadn't taken seriously the general advice to have a first colonoscopy at age 50. He chuckled and said," Oh no, you & I would have crossed paths before I turned 50. Yikes.
Dodged a bullet that hit me.
21 years later, I've been back to every 5 years for a few cycles.
But wait, there's more...
2010, and high PSA after an extended period without blood levels tested. The biopsy yielded one sample with a Gleason score troublesome for someone with as many years projected on my horizon. 12 years post-treatment, still no evidence of disease.
I did. No drugs. No IV. Walked out of the doctors office and had no ill affects.Maybe it's the drugs talking, but I can't say I feel high at all. I think I coulda done the whole thing without drugs.
This is why I waited until I found a doctor that would do it without putting me to sleep, or forcing me to get an IV during the procedure.The worst part of the procedure in the doctor's office was them inserting the IV.
Good Lord!! Nope. Put me under.This is why I waited until I found a doctor that would do it without putting me to sleep, or forcing me to get an IV during the procedure.
I thought this was a sports blog. Are we going to read about bowl selection or bowel resection?
Good Lord!! Nope. Put me under.
That's what I'm saying. I have a Ukranian friend. They claim all (or almost all) colonoscopies are performed without drugs in Ukraine and other countries.I did. No drugs. No IV. Walked out of the doctors office and had no ill affects.
The other option, "Food and Travel" would have been far less appropriate.Somewhat related, I didn't know where better to put it, thinking it represents a blind spot in those who named the game, but not wanting to appear disrespectful toward the team in the FB forum.
View attachment 81618
PS - Interesting to see that this thread got moved to "Entertainment."
That's what I'm saying. I have a Ukranian friend. They claim all (or almost all) colonoscopies are performed without drugs in Ukraine and other countries.
It's tough me to say how necessary the drugs were for me. I was awake the whole time. Chatting with Dr and others. When the Dr was about to do something that may cause discomfort she would warn me. I felt it, but it wasn't particularly uncomfortable. The drugs may of helped with that. I also think the drugs altered my ability to judge time. The procedure was fast, but it felt like 5 minutes to me. So that was likely the drugs.
I feel like the drugs helped, but I'm not sure they were necessary. Others disagree obviously.
Makes sense. Yeah, mostly a macho thing. I'd brag to the Boneyard.I had a tooth pulled and grafted at the end of 2020 using only Novocain. Granted the tooth was infected, but never again. I have another tooth that needs to be done, but I've been putting it off. It's been root canaled but there is a crack, preventing it from being crowned.
I'm sure a colonoscopy can be done without drugs or being put under. but in one of the most technologically advanced countries in terns of medicine in the world, to what end? Just to say you did? I suppose if there is a history of complications, that is one thing. My understanding is there are few side effects to Propofol and, unless you have Michael Jackson's doctor, the risks are minimal.
I had a couple friends who were badgering me to get one. I figured it was just because since they go through it, they wanted me to suffer the same fate. But then one day I was walking through my neighborhood and I asked my neighbor how her husband was, and she told me he had passed away. He was barely 50 and died from colon cancer. It kind of prompted me to bite the bullet, so to speak, and I had one.I know some people question if they should get one, but look at the recent loss of Kirstie