The only inaccuracy that I can see is the collusion with an agent in the Miles debacle. There was never any evidence presented to support that allegation. It is your choice to ignore the negative stuff or call them distortions. We can blame the NCAA for our problems and excuse JC's behavior as part of some special plan but the fact is Uconn screwed up and we are paying the price and not just tourney ban next season.
None of this stuff makes JC an ax murderer but it doesn't make him an angel either.
Why not take on the other inaccuracies that have already been addressed here?
Why ignore them?
1.
"The Faulknerian loss of innocence began immediately. Scrapping, tumbling point guard Khalid El-Amin was picked up in Hartford having bought pot." You agree with this? Apparently, Calhoun sold his soul for a player like KEA, who smoked pot, and thereby started UConn down the devil's path? Really? If you believe this, I suggest you should not be a fan of college basketball at all.
2.
Then there were the (largely unpunished) guys who stole laptops but only from women. Except for the fact they were punished, they were suspended, and according to the faculty board that decided those suspensions, they suffered the exact same fate as over 50 students who were caught stealing laptops in those years.
3.
And then came Calhoun's obsession with a problematic young player, Nate Miles, whose recruitment necessitated a prolonged collusion with an agent, even after said agent was accused by Hamilton, the hero of 1999, of stealing more than $1 million. You yourself stated this was inaccurate.
4.
The team now faces a 2013 post-season ban for different reasons — its woeful academic record. Based on a bogus APR scam that shows Kentucky with an APR of 974. UConn is now scamming the system as well. I'd argue the "woeful academics" come from the schools like Kentucky and now UConn and apparently lots of other schools that are in line with the NCAA by gaming the system. If you honestly believe APR is a measure of academic credibility then t=yuo don't know anything about how universities work. It's a figleaf for the NCAA and it perverts academics and learnoing, a point Bilas has been adamant about. If the NCAA really cared about academics they would simply require higher admission standards. That would solve the problem instantly.
Q: was there one truthful charge in the article at all?