Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Football
Fagnano it is
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="storrsroars, post: 4737135, member: 2500"] I don't know at this point whether Fagnano has a decent arm or not. I know I didn't see much completed downfield nor did I see any out patterns completed - and only one tried I can recall, where he overthrew Ross. So I'll wait before judging, it's simply too small a sample. I will say this, I think Charlton neglected the run game and the size/talent of our OL. I say this after comparing our game vs the one I was dragged to yesterday, Pitt vs Wofford. Wofford is terrible. And even with that, Jurkovic was being booed by the 2nd series. In the first series he completed one pass for no yards, ran twice for a total of six yards, and was sacked for 12. He started the 2nd series with a loss of 1 on a pass play and another bad incompletion. But the running game got a 1st down and Jurkovic finally completed a pass to a wideout for a good chunk. Based on that and what I've seen from his previous work, Jurkovic is fine as long as there's NO pressure on him. If there is any, he folds. He has a better arm than NC St's QB, but none of the escapability - or desire to extend a play, it seems. And that, to me, is a bigger part of whether Fagnano is going to succeed here or not than if he can hit a bomb. While I didn't see "happy feet" from Fagnano, I also didn't see decisiveness as to whether he was going to run or pass. And that hesitation cost him yards. Pitt went very run heavy for remainder of 1st half. And while Jurkovic compiled a respectable stat line, it was the running game (45 for 217, or a 4.8 average) that set the tone and allowed Jurkovic to play the 2nd half with virtually no pressure while finding wide open receivers. Having an air assault is fun. But given our roster and strengths, IMHO, it's the run game (and YAC on screens) that is going to win for us and provide Fagnano with greater opportunity to succeed. And by the 'run game' I mean taking it to the opponent right up the guy more often than running sweeps. Why we ran so many sweeps confounded me more than any other aspect of Charlton's gameplan. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,408
Messages
4,394,646
Members
10,208
Latest member
jskwrite
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Football
Fagnano it is
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom