Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Chuck, post: 3951401, member: 1646"] First to say, "Take it to the Soccer Board!" 😀 This is greedy of the big clubs, but they are businesses, so in the end they should do what's best for them. I don't know that is what's best for them (considering all of the hate that this is immediately getting). Yet FIFA is the proverbial glass house and their reps should stop throwing stones about "greed" and "snakes" making these decisions. Can their be a more corrupt organization that always lined their own pockets (organization and individual) over the good of the game. If this super league replaces each team's home league, then I think all involved will regret this decision. It will be exciting for a few years if you are Man U playing Real Madrid instead of that year's relegation-slot English team, but that'll get old when you lose all of your local excitement. Ask Syracuse how awesome it is to play Wake Forest over UConn. But if this replaces Champion's League, it's greedy, but it's not the end of the world. It would hurt a team like West Ham that could make Champion's League next year. Champion's League would become more like Europa. That's why I personally preferred the expanded Champion's League though. It acknowledged that the big clubs are different (whether people like it or not), but also allowed smaller clubs to bust in at least temporarily. There would still be problems, like the big teams not prioritizing league games because they wouldn't need to reach 4th place (EPL), but stuff changes. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach