- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,583
- Reaction Score
- 18,754
they've cornered the market in corn hole viewership though
MNF should've stayed on National TV anyways... They knew that giving America Nat'l TV coverage for Thursday Night then Sunday Night games while taking away Monday Night Football was gonna come back to bite them in the a**....ESPN Can’t Afford Monday Night Football Any More
Here is a well written article detailing just how much financial trouble ESPN is actually in
They paid too.Fox News lost 4 million subs between Jan 16 and Feb 17.
Too left leaning I guess.
The fact that we are even down to those two should be concerning. I wouldn’t think a flourishing giant would be unable to keep even its B or C talent around and paid.When those two get fired let me know. If either left ESPN would still be the biggest player in sports media, by far.
I am just saying ESPN is not nearing its demise.The fact that we are even down to those two should be concerning. I wouldn’t think a flourishing giant would be unable to keep even its B or C talent around and paid.
You’re telling me ESPN has at worst a neutral prognosis?
Okay well that’s not what the “circle the drain” phrase means per se. ESPN may surely be far from the bottom of the drain right now, but the downward circular trend has begun and I don’t see anything that will reverse course.I am just saying ESPN is not nearing its demise.
When you’re going through a third round of layoffs and can apparently no longer afford SVP and Jemelle Hill, that at least partially constitutes “circling the drain,” no? Is there a recovery from where they are now?
There is more to the ESPN business model which makes it very hard for ESPN to change to an over the top model. ESPN derives ~75% of revenues from cable subscriptions and ~25% from advertising. This was a good mix for economic downturns, but it is not a good mix for a streaming model. In contrast, HGTV is ~30% cable subscription fees and 70% advertising, although more economically sensitive, it means moving to a streaming model is more important and easier for HGTV to follow their audience to drive ad revenue. Also, ESPN's CPMs are close to 50% higher than the next higher cable net. Sure, ESPN has an attractive advertising audience, but that is a huge gap as they have really pressed ad pricing over the years.
It's all academic and we will be able to revisit this thread in a few years to see how the businesses are evolving and performing performing.
If anyone is interested, this is a very in-depth study of the cable tv market done by SNLKagen.
https://ofccolo.snl.com/Cache/CBC3AA560637320340.PDF?Y=&CachePath=\\dmzdoc2\webcache$\&O=PDF&D=&T=&reqFrom=SNL3
I hear you BUT this state and the type of people who get elected year after year are to blame - the sooner all these ruling party people fade away, the quicker the state can retire. They can move to California and New York where they will be right at home.There’s nothing good about any of this. I know we all hate ESPN for the situation we’re in because the conspiracy theory is that they blocked us or didn’t help us.
In reality, the downfall of ESPN will continue to devestate this state. Another major employer either leaving the state or, in this case, shedding jobs like crazy. This is bad news for the state. There’s nothing to be happy at here...
I hear you BUT this state and the type of people who get elected year after year are to blame - the sooner all these ruling party people fade away, the quicker the state can retire. They can move to California and New York where they will be right at home.
ESPN has brought this upon themselves and to be truthful I only watch it for actual games - I won't listen to the drivel of their "talk" shows.
The problem with ESPN has been Disney calling the shots
It’s all about the rights. ESPN owns the content lots of folks want to see. You don’t have to watch, but you can’t watch it anywhere else.Okay well that’s not what the “circle the drain” phrase means per se. ESPN may surely be far from the bottom of the drain right now, but the downward circular trend has begun and I don’t see anything that will reverse course.
ESPN as a network doesn’t have other prime time entertainment like the other big networks do to fall back on for revenue: it’s all live sports (for which they overpaid) and highlights/commentary (which they can no longer afford).
It’s about the rights. No one is broadcasting for free.It will be interesting to see if College football & basketball migrates towards over the air television and conference networks. If conference networks play a bigger role going forward, one would hope we would become valuable for our content ?
Network television shows during the week have been steadily losing viewers. You have to wonder if during the winter months the networks would broadcast some of the better college basketball games during the week?
Things will be changing the next few years and it should be an interesting ride. Hopefully we get a seat at the big boy table when it's all said and done.
It's about competition. Games too long. Too many commercials. Tired of the Liberal bias. They won't be extinct, but more people are finding other things to do.It’s all about the rights. ESPN owns the content lots of folks want to see. You don’t have to watch, but you can’t watch it anywhere else.
Don’t watch. No one will miss you. Don’t expect to see SEC, ACC, AAC, and others somewhere else though. Only ESPN has those rights. Disney loved ESPN when they were 1/3 of their profit, and 2% of their overhead. Now that they’re 10% of profit and 4% of overhead they aren’t as happy. Only $billions in profit every year.It's about competition. Games too long. Too many commercials. Tired of the Liberal bias. They won't be extinct, but more people are finding other things to do.
They probably got great ad rates and Disney was cleaning up. Now it's not such a cash cow I'm guessing.