still dont see how Kentucky is below Tennessee or Maryland. They should be #5 or so... maybe #4. Will definitely find out all about them this weekend coming up.
Everyone has now played between 7 and 11 games. And already we have 8/9 teams with 2 losses and one team with 3 losses in the top 25. Parity?
Yes and no. I think there are more competitive teams, but I still think we're a long way from a team seeded lower than 2 winning the tourney with any regularity.Everyone has now played between 7 and 11 games. And already we have 8/9 teams with 2 losses and one team with 3 losses in the top 25. Parity?
cavernous divide is right. and you picked out the only other team besides UCONN who i think has a legit shot to win it all next year...Yes and no. I think there are more competitive teams, but I still think we're a long way from a team seeded lower than 2 winning the tourney with any regularity.
And in 2012-13, there will be a cavernous divide between UConn and Baylor and everyone else. And 2013-14, between UConn and everyone else.
There are three huge issues holding the mid-majors back, in my view:It would be so great to see a mid-major go deep into the tournament but the way the recruiting battles are going I don't think it will happen anytime soon. That's one reason why I find the Delaware situation so interesting.... A mid-major featuring a big-time D1 talent.