ESPN updated stats - UCONN 1st in Blocks & FG Pct. 4th in scoring margin | The Boneyard

ESPN updated stats - UCONN 1st in Blocks & FG Pct. 4th in scoring margin

Status
Not open for further replies.
Third in assists, and second! in turnovers.
 
Ranked #1 for the rest of the Year..........Geno wants to see how his team will beat Duke WO KML and Tuck.........WE will start to see Geno go on the offensive towards the Duke crazies and all the waiter jokes.....
 
It will be fun to watch scoring margin as the year progresses. UConn will continue to be in the high 30s (maybe 40 if everything goes right) while everyone else will eventually go below 30.
 
... WE will start to see Geno go on the offensive towards the Duke crazies and all the waiter jokes ...

Says what evidence?

He's put that stuff toward Duke behind him, and he's certainly not worried about anything in this game except foul trouble.
 
It will be fun to watch scoring margin as the year progresses. UConn will continue to be in the high 30s (maybe 40 if everything goes right) while everyone else will eventually go below 30.
Sounds accurate to me.
 
It will be fun to watch scoring margin as the year progresses. UConn will continue to be in the high 30s (maybe 40 if everything goes right) while everyone else will eventually go below 30.
Yes, we have played three of what are likely to be our closest games up front this year and few if anything like the ND games late in the season to close the margin. The margin will grow.
 
It all depends on the level of the competition, and we've played three of the best.
 
Nice to see the AAC doing okay over on Sagarin ratings too. Decent 6th spot in the rankings, and in Simple Average rankings is just barely behind PAC. Although there are of course some AAC teams with weak ratings, both Temple and SMU (6-0) are doing respectably. With all the whining going on about the AAC, you would think the AAC was lodged down somewhere with the Sags 34th and last rated conference, something called Dummy at -90.00. Who would have thunk it that SMU at this point would be ahead of Texas Tech over in the all-powerful Big 12. Big 10 is only major conference with no teams in top 10, while the PAC and Big 12 have only 1. AAC has 2.

And this will change drastically in the future, but Baylor's schedule is rated 326 of 345 teams after playing all 200+ ranked teams except the powerhouse #171 Rice team. UConn also has a poorly rated schedule but is one of only four teams to play three top 25 opponents, with Louisville also sporting a 3-0 record in such contests, UCLA at 1-2, and Middle Tenn at 3-0. Top rated schedule goes to Central Michigan which has only played three games somehow.
 
UConn's schedule is a good example of why measuring schedule strength is so difficult.

Based on Sagarin ratings, the UConn schedule is ranked 172. But that's largely because the weakest UConn opponents are dragging down the ratings. UConn will beat Monmouth, ranked #319, but would have no problems with a much higher ranked team.

In contrast, the schedule of Virginia Tech is rated as stronger, even though the toughest team on the schedule is only the 85th best team in the country

  • 85 Florida 76.49
  • 112 Richmond 73.61
  • 133 Old Dominion 71.51
  • 146 Hofstra 70.34
  • 159 Bucknell 69.34
  • 254 Howard 61.26

This is not proof that the metric is flawed.

Suppose you were Ball State, with a rating of about 70. If you play against UConn's schedule with the following ratings:
  • 97.22
  • 92.63
  • 89.99
  • 71.63
  • 69.08
  • 64.34
  • 60.18
  • 55.08

you expect to lose 4 and win 4.

However, if you play Virginia Tech's schedule, you expect to go 2-4. So, to Ball State, the Virginia Tech schedule looks tougher. To UConn, the Virginia Tech schedule looks like a cakewalk, while the actual schedule has three potential teams who could challenge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
255
Guests online
1,457
Total visitors
1,712

Forum statistics

Threads
164,067
Messages
4,380,847
Members
10,177
Latest member
silver fox


.
..
Top Bottom