Agree, and would throw in that Mr. in the know on SC, didn't even know that Watkins will not be playing this coming season. So much for his insight.Voepel can't write about UConn without throwing some shade. "What could go wrong" is the usual theme every year. This year it's Geno retiring.
What problems does SCar have to overcome? Nothing.
Notice that there is no doubt about Watkins' return to 100%. When it was Fudd or Bueckers their return to 100% was always in doubt. But that's Voepel, who still pines for his orange goddess.
I not only predict a repeat Husky championship, I think it’s been a long time since, yeah, I’ll say it, the possibility of an undefeated season has also loomed so large.
Agree, and would throw in that Mr. in the know on SC, didn't even know that Watkins will not be playing this coming season. So much for his insight.
My point being that Mr. in the know all about SC, did not have a clue about Watkins. Did he do his job, 0r just assume what he put into print. Until proven to the contrary I'll go with, he assumed and fell om his face.Pretty sure this story was written before the Watkins story came out. Also, he wrote the ESPN article about Watkins.
The persecution complex on this board is staggering.
Add a commaWhat's a YER? Does it have horns? Does it go to UConn? A pet peeve of mine illiteracy on line.
Some commas are optional. Some morning I wake up British. It's a short terrifying time.Add a comma
lol have to agree with you on thatThe persecution complex on this board is staggering.
A number of people think the earth is flat. Doesnt make it true.A number of others seem to share that feeling and gave some up pervasive evidence of it
I don’t think it’s unreasonable to think any writer for any publication might not always be objective
And I think Vopel may be that way re Uconn
A number of people think the earth is flat. Doesnt make it true.
That’s great! Make sure you give them the correct spelling-UCONNAlready scheduled an appointment to get a Duke WBB 2026 Final 4 tattoo.
You have an opinion that you gave us and that many debunk as pure folly. ESPN did not show any bias in this article and Jana, while showing improvement does not warrant any specific mention. I would say Blanca deserved a mention as a top freshman possibility, the AA potential is a bridge too far for me but I do agree she’s extremely talented and will contribute mightily this year.really
this is a forum for OPINIONS !!
if your goal is just to be a contrarian, I think you’ve succeeded
And your so-called debunking are merely contrary opinions because the underlying bias alleged — whether certain specific cited episodes constitute bias — is non-adjucatable by law or fact because it is based on people’s perceptions or feelings.You have an opinion that you gave us and that many debunk as pure folly. ESPN did not show any bias in this article and Jana, while showing improvement does not warrant any specific mention. I would say Blanca deserved a mention as a top freshman possibility, the AA potential is a bridge too far for me but I do agree she’s extremely talented and will contribute mightily this year.
I agree with you. In regard to something like this – stick to what you believe. For example some posters probably believed right from the beginning UCONN was going to win. While others may not have believed until last minutes.lol have to agree with you on that
The idea that ESPN with somehow have an anti-uconn bias it’s really silly
that being said, I had started the conversation about Voepel and wondering if others thought he had some animus regarding Uconn
A number of others seem to share that feeling and gave some up pervasive evidence of it
I don’t think it’s unreasonable to think any writer for any publication might not always be objective
And I think Vopel may be that way re Uconn
What happened?Blanca! Blanca! Blanca! Blanca! Blanca!
Nothing. I was just channeling all the excitement around the prospect of Blanca’s contributions to the team. Sorry for the confusion.What happened?