More like UConn wannabe South.At this rate, Maryland will become UConn South with the transfers Brenda has from the Huskies.![]()
This must be right. They also leave because the demands of Geno’s program are oppressive to them. I think this is why Saylor left, or at least that’s what she said in an interview. It’s too bad, since she has some serious talent. Think what she could have made of herself if she’d stayed. As it is, she seems to be adrift. I hope she finds what she’s looking for at MD.I would like to know, at the end of their career at another school, just how many minutes they averaged per game. When a player transfers to another school, no matter how they might rationalize it, their purpose is to get more playing time and I don't blame them for this but it should also be with the realization that the coaching they will be getting is inferior to Uconn and that they have less of a chance of reaching their full potential.
She isn’t developing for a pro career under Close in the slightest. Close’s misuse of Betts against LSU is why they lost.
She’s an elite player. Under a better coach, she easily goes in the lottery in her year. She’s a good player coached by someone who has no idea how to use her when the time comes.
The other problem has been the guards surrounding her. They never communicate the pass and that’s why she bumbles it. CLW should solve that problem thankfully.
I agree. Probably a lottery pick even now. Betts developed a lot last year, improved her footwork in the paint and seemed to be quicker than she’d been at Stanford and in high school. She still lumbers up and down the court a bit. She’ll need to address this as a pro or she won’t play much. Watch Kamila or Jonquel or A’ja and one thing you see is how well they run the court and how quickly they move. Even Griner in her prime ran well. Slow bigs can stick in the W, but they don’t seem to thrive there. The game moves too quickly for them.Betts will go lottery, she had a very good season. Sounds like you have issues with Coach Close.
I did not see Betts play last year, but I know that another of the reasons UConn women have an edge in the fourth quarter (when games are usually won, but games can be lost in the first three quarters & UConn has not had that problem {losing in any of the 1st three quarters} since 1986) is the intensity in the weight room spurred on by Hudy, and embraced by this "crop" of Huskies.I agree. Probably a lottery pick even now. Betts developed a lot last year, improved her footwork in the paint and seemed to be quicker than she’d been at Stanford and in high school. She still lumbers up and down the court a bit. She’ll need to address this as a pro or she won’t play much. Watch Kamila or Jonquel or A’ja and one thing you see is how well they run the court and how quickly they move. Even Griner in her prime ran well. Slow bigs can stick in the W, but they don’t seem to thrive there. The game moves too quickly for them.
I didn't know that Janet Reno coached!I did not see Betts play last year, but I know that another of the reasons UConn women have an edge in the fourth quarter (when games are usually won, but games can be lost in the first three quarters & UConn has not had that problem {losing in any of the 1st three quarters} since 1986) is the intensity in the weight room spurred on by Hudy, and embraced by this "crop" of Huskies.
It may be that we get glimpses of it in the off-season workouts, but that toughness translates nicely into fighting for rebounds (when the footwork from full speed practices gets them into position) and launching themselves after loose balls. Being able to out-sprint the defense for fast breaks [like Pheesa still does] with no need to dribble because the passing is perfect...
In my biased view, Betts would be a back-up to Jana this year, as well as to AE last year, but she would have gotten more than 20 minutes as AE could also handle the PF position. My whole point here is that Kiah Stokes is a two-time WNBA champion because most of the WNBA coaches understand that the UConn women are well prepared for the WNBA due to the work ethic instilled and talents developed in the UConn system with Reno, CD, et. al....
Go Huskies!!!
No she didn't, but she must control the AI that is a knock-off of Chat GPT....I didn't know that Janet Reno coached!![]()
I did not see Betts play last year, but I know that another of the reasons UConn women have an edge in the fourth quarter (when games are usually won, but games can be lost in the first three quarters & UConn has not had that problem {losing in any of the 1st three quarters} since 1986) is the intensity in the weight room spurred on by Hudy, and embraced by this "crop" of Huskies.
It may be that we get glimpses of it in the off-season workouts, but that toughness translates nicely into fighting for rebounds (when the footwork from full speed practices gets them into position) and launching themselves after loose balls. Being able to out-sprint the defense for fast breaks [like Pheesa still does] with no need to dribble because the passing is perfect...
In my biased view, Betts would be a back-up to Jana this year, as well as to AE last year, but she would have gotten more than 20 minutes as AE could also handle the PF position. My whole point here is that Kiah Stokes is a two-time WNBA champion because most of the WNBA coaches understand that the UConn women are well prepared for the WNBA due to the work ethic instilled and talents developed in the UConn system with Reno, CD, et. al....
Go Huskies!!!
You are brave. I wasn't going to touch that comment, as there are a bunch of questionable statements (like not losing a single game in the first 3 quarters since the 80s...like sit down sis and stop drinking the Kool aid. Y'all were down by 25 points entering the 4th quarter against South Carolina this past season).Why do you think your player returning from serious injury and that has not played any college ball is better than the All PAC 12 center?
Seems odd.
SC and NC State play in Charlotte on 11/10, so we'll know early. I'm driving up to Charlotte for that one after going to Vegas for SC/Michigan. I better save some money for March Madness.I would flip UConn and USC. I think USC has more players proven at the college level.
North Carolina is too high.
NC State may be better than we think they are again.
Creighton is too high. No Ronsiek and she wasn’t replaced with equal or better quality.
The rest is probably fine with me.
You better save some money for Vegas first.SC and NC State play in Charlotte on 11/10, so we'll know early. I'm driving up to Charlotte for that one after going to Vegas for SC/Michigan. I better save some money for March Madness.
Texas also has a tough schedule. They play SCar twice.
UConn could end up being #1 before playing SCar unless Texas beats them to #1 & sends UConn to #3.
Texas plays:
#6 ND
#1 SCar twice
#10 Oklahoma
#24 Alabama
#18 Maryland
#20 Ole Miss
#22 Kentucky
#7 LSU