- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,908
- Reaction Score
- 8,293
UCF has an inherent advantage being in, well, Florida.
That's fair, but it's a crutch we will always use to explain lousy coaching. Boise is in the middle of Idaho. Peterson did it. Not only that, but he left, and the next guy kept it going at the same level. Their pinnacle was beating oklahoma, ours was getting destroyed by them
We made safe/easy choices from the top down, which resulted in a team that would lose to middle of the road HS teams.
BTW, the Frost example is reasonable despite the location. UCF was 0-12, then 6-7, then 13-0. They hired an innovative coach who could get the same kids they had, to play better than they did before without replacing them all.
Our next hire HAS TO BE someone who has proven he can win with players that aren't rated as highly...because we will never get a load of 4-star players (not until we start winning with what we have). We have to win by being better coached than the other team, that will cause better players to look our way. It doesn't work any other way. In my mind, this is someone who wins for a few years in FCS without a bunch of transfers or JUCO's. For whatever my 0.02 is worth.