Is this what you want to believe or is that what you actually think the truth is?
Randy left a lot to be desired in a lot of areas. But please, let's stop with the "How he left" stuff. This is big time college sports, not Little League.
My guess is that this deal was done before the Fiesta (most folks seem to agree). If he announces, he doesn't coach UConn against Oklahoma (SOP in situations like this at most big time programs). They don't want someone who is "dumping them for a new suitor" to remain on the sidelines.
Maryland (to their credit) must have agreed to a post-game announcement so as not to spoil Randy's moment of glory. But . . . they also probably demanded that RE get his to College Park ASAP for the Formal,breaking news, announcement. I'm sure that they didn't want this leaking out via Twitter, player interview, etc.
So the trade off was Maryland waits to make announcement, RE gets to coach in Fiesta Bowl, then time to "pay the piper" . . . say nothing to anyone, get on the first plane "outta Dodge City", and be here in the morning. The UConn players . . . these are young men who should understand this stuff to some extent. . . . deal with it. Ditto +100 for the fans.
Touchdown Husky, that would be the 300th-hit-seeking Mr. Palmeri to you.
Ok Matt. . . you take spelling, I'll take math. Pretty sure that Rafael P (I'll leave the spelling to you) had a "few more" than 300 hits. But why "nit-pick"?
Shays, R-Conn., was ridiculed in the media for getting facts about baseball and sports history wrong and incorrectly pronouncing the name of former slugger Rafael Palmeiro... He pronounced Palmeiro as "Palmeree," and talked about Palmeiro's 300th career hit instead of his 3,000th career hit. Palmeiro appeared before the committee in 2005.
Wow, Connecticut still doesn't get this big time sports thing the way the rest of the country does.
If an Elite pass offense in CFB was the "make or break" in big time athletics . . . the Huskies would be playing with Trinity in the New England Small College Conference . . . and maybe struggling even there.
One question -- between having Edsall quit out of the blue while preparing for the bowl, or leaving the way he did, do you really believe the players would have wanted him to leave early? Really?
It is a shame that the world of college sports has become so devoid of ethics and morals. But to blame an individual for playing along seems harsh. Especially to those who have left employers/law firms in sensitive situations and actually have had to struggle with these issues.
This is such a cop out. The world of college sports has become so devoid of ethics and morals BECAUSE of the actions of individuals. The actions create the atmosphere, not the other way around.
It is not coaches that create the atmosphere. A coach who views their program as more important than a university's educational mission and ethical boundaries, in a sane world, would be fired on the spot. The atmosphere is created by the trustees, and the politicians who appoint them, who allow coaches and ADs to chase money and wins instead of integrating their programs into the university.
Your theory is that Trinity and Yale don't have these issues because they hire less power hungry coaches and ADs. Nonsense. Trinity and yale don't have these issues because their coaches and ADs know that, while winning is part of their job, everything else is not forgiven so long as they win.
Those last two paragraphs, by the way, have nothing to do with Randy Edsall whatsoever, thought I doubt most of his detractors will be able to see that. If the NCAA gave a crap about protecting players from coaches leaving, as opposed to protecting their powerful institutions from doing whatever they want to do at the moment, they would simply say, as any pro league does, that you can't talk to another team's coach until his season is done. Period. To blame the coaches because the system forces them into this awful Hobson's choice of abandoning their players before the bowl game or leaving in a nanosecond afterwards is, frankly, idiotic. Are baseball managers more ethical than football coaches because they don't negotiate their next job while they're still employed? You really believe that? It's that their system, in this case, has firmer ethical groundings.
Your theory then states that everyone is unethical and it is only rules that keep them from beign otherwise. That is fine, but don't say someone is ethical and moral but they are only forced to break the rules. That applies across the board, and I don't care about Edsall.