early returns on transfer | Page 2 | The Boneyard

early returns on transfer

One of my gripes with many coaches -- including Kim -- is going "radio silent" (as you put it) when dealing with issues. I'm not talking about medical issues, where the injured person is protected by law on disclosures, but on issues such as these. Angel turned 21 in May and is an adult. We're clearly beyond the time of "protecting the amateur student athlete," so what gives? If it's a violation of team rules or she looked at you funny, own up to it. Is she having personal issues and you've granted her time off? Well, state that, too. A coach can protect innermost secrets yet identify a root cause...there's an entire industry predicated on this.
Have to disagree. Do you feel entitled to know any personnel issues with your colleagues? Colleagues in the same industry? Any employed individual?
 
The lack of information from Kim most certainly leads to rampant speculation. So let me offer some speculation of my own on the nature of the problem. As I indicated earlier in this thread, I watched a video this morning that tracked Reese’s problems far earlier in the season: not posting up strong, not moving her feet and playing “ole” defense.

Last season Reese was spectacular in leading LSU to the national championship while being named MOP. From that point on everything was a whirlwind: SI Swimsuit photo shoot, music videos, NIL endorsements, hanging out with A-Listers on the banquet circuit, etc.

Here’s my speculation. Reese is out of shape. She probably ate well on the banquet circuit and was too busy to make it to the gym on a regular basis. Again, it’s all speculation on my part, but after watching her stand around on the court, barely moving on defense, lack of conditioning is certainly a plausible explanation.
I'm surprised that those in-game issues would get her booted from the team even temporarily...............I would have thought that she would have been just stuck to the end of the bench until her play/attitude improved............perhaps it's a bigger attitude issue or as some have said, an academic issue......either way, I bet she'll be back, probably not in time for the Virginia Tech game but surely by some time in December........although it will never happen, I know a team that could certainly use her if she does get permanently booted ........:rolleyes:
 
I know a team that could certainly use her if she does get permanently booted ........:rolleyes:
She could never play for Geno ... unless perhaps she totally lost the attitude. But, if she did that she could play for Kim again and have a shot at another NC. :)
 
Holy thread drift Batman!

There's a dedicated LSU thread that might be a better place to discuss/speculate about their internal drama.
 
.-.
Holy thread drift Batman!

There's a dedicated LSU thread that might be a better place to discuss/speculate about their internal drama.
What does it matter, neither are actually about UConn.
 
What does it matter, neither are actually about UConn.
It's the general women's basketball forum. It not being about UConn is the whole point of why the mods created this forum. If posters aren't interested in something if it doesn't relate to UConn, there is absolutely no reason why they would need to wander into this particular area of the site.
 
Because people don't want to open a thread not about LSU and Angel Reese, and that's what it ends up being about.
Just ignore those posts then. Geez, how difficult is that? This thread is a melting pot of many topics.
 
Just ignore those posts then. Geez, how difficult is that? This thread is a melting pot of many topics.
I'll take the blame for this one going off-kilter when @oldude and I talked about Angel Reese and segued into the Kim-Reese/Poole situation, since it involved transfers (kinda ;)) and then it took off from there.
Mea culpa (lapsing into Pope John 1 mass-speak!

That said -- upon closer inspection -- most of the posts on this thread are about impactful transfers from and at many different schools. (I wrote two of them.)
 
.-.
I'll take the blame for this one going off-kilter when @oldude and I talked about Angel Reese and segued into the Kim-Reese/Poole situation, since it involved transfers (kinda ;)) and then it took off from there.
Mea culpa (lapsing into Pope John 1 mass-speak!

That said -- upon closer inspection -- most of the posts on this thread are about impactful transfers from and at many different schools. (I wrote two of them.)
And you felt it necessary to respond to my post which suggested that people simply ignore any comments about subjects that deviated from the thread topic? Hmm!
 
And you felt it necessary to respond to my post which suggested that people simply ignore any comments about subjects that deviated from the thread topic? Hmm!
I probably should've replied to @nwhoopfan's take, of which you and I kept going. But does it really matter? :confused:(As noted, I'm guilty as charged). Moving on from this subject....:D
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
168,238
Messages
4,559,297
Members
10,445
Latest member
Azerion


Top Bottom