- Joined
- Nov 27, 2022
- Messages
- 263
- Reaction Score
- 1,389
I don’t know. I don’t see a lot of rebounding there.Now THAT is some talent
I don’t know. I don’t see a lot of rebounding there.Now THAT is some talent
That's the kind of dynasty I could live with..........at least four of them.
As incredible as this current run is, this is the one part that somewhat worries me. I'd absolutely love to be the Alabama football of college basketball but I hope our fanbase doesn't get to the point of spoilage that ANY loss at all is cause to claim the sky is falling.
Dabo has had an incredible ten-year run at Clemson by nearly any metric but look how the fans have treated him after the last few "down" years. Straight up calling into sports talk shows to question why he deserves to get paid so much and maybe it's time to move on...um what???
I hope to God we are better than that Husky Nation.
We actually collectively are probably worse. hahahaSpoiler alert: we're not. Enjoy the moment.
Amen to that. The whole basketball world is acknowledging the quality of coaching and play and that will make it easier to get the right kind of players to commit here.Rob Duaster said on his podcast that McNeeley and Mahaney both left multiple 100s of k in nil on the table from other schools for the opportunity to get coached up by this staff. The belief now is you come to UConn to become a pro and make more on the backend. That says it all.
He absolutely did. Go back and listen. He even initially said a specific number w McNeeley of 400k then caught himself and tried to back track by being less specific and said multiple 100’s. Goodman all but agreed. Nothing abstract about it.No he didn't. He was speaking in the abstract. He doesn't know this, he didn't claim to know this. He was postulating. He was saying "maybe players think they can take a little less to maximize their value to the NBA down the road".
He never stated as fact that they left money on the table. People have to stop quoting opinions as fact and stop hearing what they want to hear instead of what is actually being said.
This has been especially hilarious in the NIL area where no one has ANY idea what offers are. Not Trilly, not Dauster, not anyone.
It is amazing how wrong people get NIL. And also that people don't realize that it is the interest of both players AND Schools that inflated numbers are out there.
Now I will give my opinion in the form of a question. When has anyone ever known 18-22 year olds be forward thinking about money (taking less to have more later) ? In most cases, all things being equal, a kid will want to take the biggest offer because it is a measure of value against their peers. There of course are exceptions like kids want to play for winners, or maybe their family situation reduces the allure of NIL, but again those are exceptions not the rule. Kids may take less at UConn (but again nobody really knows that except the parties involved.) but you better believe it isn't as far apart as people want you to believe.
One of my neighbors says Dabo won't use the portal so criticism of him may be warranted in an era with massive change. Our basketball staff has quickly adjusted and the results are what the Clemson football fans want.As incredible as this current run is, this is the one part that somewhat worries me. I'd absolutely love to be the Alabama football of college basketball but I hope our fanbase doesn't get to the point of spoilage that ANY loss at all is cause to claim the sky is falling.
Dabo has had an incredible ten-year run at Clemson by nearly any metric but look how the fans have treated him after the last few "down" years. Straight up calling into sports talk shows to question why he deserves to get paid so much and maybe it's time to move on...um what???
I hope to God we are better than that Husky Nation.
I think the fact their mothers were on the visit and heard the offer may have brought a higher, less emotional, thought process into the equation and perhaps some longer term thinking but.............I'm speculating but it came to me later in life that I would have benefited by listening to parental advice more than I did.No he didn't. He was speaking in the abstract. He doesn't know this, he didn't claim to know this. He was postulating. He was saying "maybe players think they can take a little less to maximize their value to the NBA down the road".
He never stated as fact that they left money on the table. People have to stop quoting opinions as fact and stop hearing what they want to hear instead of what is actually being said.
This has been especially hilarious in the NIL area where no one has ANY idea what offers are. Not Trilly, not Dauster, not anyone.
It is amazing how wrong people get NIL. And also that people don't realize that it is the interest of both players AND Schools that inflated numbers are out there.
Now I will give my opinion in the form of a question. When has anyone ever known 18-22 year olds be forward thinking about money (taking less to have more later) ? In most cases, all things being equal, a kid will want to take the biggest offer because it is a measure of value against their peers. There of course are exceptions like kids want to play for winners, or maybe their family situation reduces the allure of NIL, but again those are exceptions not the rule. Kids may take less at UConn (but again nobody really knows that except the parties involved.) but you better believe it isn't as far apart as people want you to believe.
He was picking numbers out of thin air to use an example as an opinion.He absolutely did. Go back and listen. He even initially said a specific number w McNeeley of 400k then caught himself and tried to back track by being less specific and said multiple 100’s. Goodman all but agreed. Nothing abstract about it.
And you are wrong. People absolutely know numbers. Now, I agree, kids aren’t always paid in full but people within basketball community do know what’s going and it’s probably way more egregious than you can grasp.
I can only speak for myself but I vividly remember the post Corny/McKay pre Jim Calhoun days and where we were then, compared both to what could be viewed as run of the mill programs and compared to the top of the BE (and a few non BE schools), who appeared to be built for multiple deep tournament runs.As incredible as this current run is, this is the one part that somewhat worries me. I'd absolutely love to be the Alabama football of college basketball but I hope our fanbase doesn't get to the point of spoilage that ANY loss at all is cause to claim the sky is falling.
Dabo has had an incredible ten-year run at Clemson by nearly any metric but look how the fans have treated him after the last few "down" years. Straight up calling into sports talk shows to question why he deserves to get paid so much and maybe it's time to move on...um what???
I hope to God we are better than that Husky Nation.
Ok.He was picking numbers out of thin air to use an example as an opinion.
You probably think Kobe Brea told Duke his asking was 1.8 million don't you? Because Trilly said so? LOL.
Let me preface this by saying there is nothing wrong with taking top dollar. Obviously, all other things being equal, more money is preferable to less money and we all need to do better when players we want opt for more money elsewhere.Now I will give my opinion in the form of a question. When has anyone ever known 18-22 year olds be forward thinking about money (taking less to have more later) ? In most cases, all things being equal, a kid will want to take the biggest offer because it is a measure of value against their peers. There of course are exceptions like kids want to play for winners, or maybe their family situation reduces the allure of NIL, but again those are exceptions not the rule. Kids may take less at UConn (but again nobody really knows that except the parties involved.) but you better believe it isn't as far apart as people want you to believe.
Yeah, we were lucky their injuries and the timing of their injuries didn't derail us. So, yes really. We could've easily lost Steph or Clingan for the season or the tourney.Not really, it was totally abnormal how injured we were during the later Ollie years. Jackson had injuries and Samson's entire sophomore season was derailed by injury. Clingan and Castle were hurt this season but we were at full strength for the tournament.
The question is not only can we continue to replicate our approach successfully, but also how long will it take every other coach to adjust. The second part is unclear to me.I would never, ever go that far because I am certain that my words have a direct impact on our fortunes.
But I think Hurley and this staff, in recent years, have cracked the code on what kind of team wins. It’s beyond getting good players, it’s getting smart players who are capable of focus beyond what most college players are capable of.
That’s why we saw the UConn avalanche over and over and over the past two years. Good teams can keep up for 10, 15, 20 minutes, but eventually UConn cracks them and it’s off to the races.
I really don’t know if they can. It isn’t just basketball, it’s inner strength. Somehow, we find kids with IQ, skill coachability and most importantly, incredible work ethic. It is talent identification far beyond anything we’ve seen before. It’s like our coaches have some sort of special test they give players to see if they have the right makeup.The question is not only can we continue to replicate our approach successfully, but also how long will it take every other coach to adjust. The second part is unclear to me.
Agree, it is one part personnel identification, but the other part is very, very sophisticated X's and O's. In essence we run 10 basic sets with each set having four or five variations available to it. That is incredibly hard to plan against. That's where I think the rest of college basketball needs to adapt.I really don’t know if they can. It isn’t just basketball, it’s inner strength. Somehow, we find kids with IQ, skill coachability and most importantly, incredible work ethic. It is talent identification far beyond anything we’ve seen before. It’s like our coaches have some sort of special test they give players to see if they have the right makeup.
And it's very difficult to learn. You can't be a low basketball IQ and run those sets. Last September, when Hurley was asked in front of a bunch of reporters how Castle was doing, he said he was doing okay, but that he needed to learn the offense better and the defensive scheme better. Castle's basketball IQ is high and he was more than up to the task, but he still had to learn it. It helps that Newton, Karaban, Clingan, and Diarra were returnees that could help him and Spencer learn.Agree, it is one part personnel identification, but the other part is very, very sophisticated X's and O's. In essence we run 10 basic sets with each set having four or five variations available to it. That is incredibly hard to plan against. That's where I think the rest of college basketball needs to adapt.
This.And it's very difficult to learn. You can't be a low basketball IQ and run those sets. Last September, when Hurley was asked in front of a bunch of reporters how Castle was doing, he said he was doing okay, but that he needed to learn the offense better and the defensive scheme better. Castle's basketball IQ is high and he was more than up to the task, but he still had to learn it. It helps that Newton, Karaban, Clingan, and Diarra were returnees that could help him and Spencer learn.
UConn is nothing like Florida.Ask Florida how that worked out after their back-to-back.
UCLA was a dynasty. Celtics and Yankees had their own dynasties. UConn women - dynasty. UConn men - two years away from first round losses.
Florida missed the NCAAT the two years after their back-to-back. They weren't ranked in the preseason poll the next year, and basically skirted the fringe of the poll for two years, topping out at #18 in 2009, but being ranked a total of 7 weeks out of the potential 38. Florida had little history before those back-to-backs, and have been only a good program since (5 E8s, 1 FF).UConn is nothing like Florida.