Maybe it’s just me. Just seems like a different vibe. The kids that are coming in, if they commit to the weight room, will wind up being very good. He knows what he’s doingTom Herman on what's he's learned in his first year at Texas: "That three straight losing seasons takes its toll on kids, it really does. The players were overmatched. So were the coaches.”
I’m sure RE could say the same thing.
We heard the same gibberish from Diaco. We inherited a mess. P said he arrived to empty cupboards. This is the sorta talk coaches say to boosters. Edsall dropped the numbers from 2010 compared to 2017 to emphasize the crap job Diaco did. Coaches love doing this kind of thing.Maybe it’s just me. Just seems like a different vibe. The kids that are coming in, if they commit to the weight room, will wind up being very good. He knows what he’s doing
We heard the same gibberish from Diaco. We inherited a mess. P said he arrived to empty cupboards. This is the sorta talk coaches say to boosters. Edsall dropped the numbers from 2010 compared to 2017 to emphasize the crap job Diaco did. Coaches love doing this kind of thing.
Tom Herman on what's he's learned in his first year at Texas: "That three straight losing seasons takes its toll on kids, it really does. The players were overmatched. So were the coaches.”
I’m sure RE could say the same thing.
Yeah, but data always beats BS. Every time. The only thing you might question with the Edsall data is where he drew the parse lines. I like to see distributions. Mean, median, standard deviation for each group of positions requiring similar skills. But Randy gave us much more than we ever had before.We heard the same gibberish from Diaco. We inherited a mess. P said he arrived to empty cupboards. This is the sorta talk coaches say to boosters. Edsall dropped the numbers from 2010 compared to 2017 to emphasize the crap job Diaco did. Coaches love doing this kind of thing.
I took his comment to mean before he came on board.It’s more likely that Tom Herman believes in Santa than he believes he was overmatched this season.
I took his comment to mean before he came on board.
But in Edsall's case, he has seen the results of the work, and has developed players that have had further success.We heard the same gibberish from Diaco. We inherited a mess. P said he arrived to empty cupboards. This is the sorta talk coaches say to boosters. Edsall dropped the numbers from 2010 compared to 2017 to emphasize the crap job Diaco did. Coaches love doing this kind of thing.
Or at least the supporting evidence that led to his conclusions if not actual proof. I like his analytical approach although you gotta think that all top coaches have to have that stuff at their fingertips. In Randy's case he has a good solid baseline (2010) with which to make a valid comparison. The other two guys did not have that although you would have to think that they could have gotten some data from other places to use as a baseline. Aren't there coaching books out there that document team statistical profiles needed to be successful at certain levels?But in Edsall's case, he has seen the results of the work, and has developed players that have had further success.
I give an experienced coach with some success a bit more credibility than a snake oil salesman on his first gig. Both are in sales mode. One will take the time to show you proof.
It’s all fluff until the team reports for Spring/Fall camp and get to work. What I am a fan of is body type. Clearly RE2 recruited a certain body type for various positions. Bigger guys in the box. Speed and athleticism come next. We have some of that with our incomin skill guys. Third is football smarts. That’s the intangible that we can’t truly measure from a highlight tape, however, I trust that RE2 watched enough game film to measure how these kids adapt to different situations throughout the course of the entire game.Or at least the supporting evidence that led to his conclusions if not actual proof. I like his analytical approach although you gotta think that all top coaches have to have that stuff at their fingertips. In Randy's case he has a good solid baseline (2010) with which to make a valid comparison. The other two guys did not have that although you would have to think that they could have gotten some data from other places to use as a baseline. Aren't there coaching books out there that document team statistical profiles needed to be successful at certain levels?
Yup, you can't really judge speed well on film unless you look at one guy for a LOT of games. But you can judge agility pretty easily. Awkwardness and first step quickness has a way of standing out.It’s all fluff until the team reports for Spring/Fall camp and get to work. What I am a fan of is body type. Clearly RE2 recruited a certain body type for various positions. Bigger guys in the box. Speed and athleticism come next. We have some of that with our incomin skill guys. Third is football smarts. That’s the intangible that we can’t truly measure from a highlight tape, however, I trust that RE2 watched enough game film to measure how these kids adapt to different situations throughout the course of the entire game.
Time will tell how these kids adapt to the college level
Let’s face it. And maybe you guys can speak to this even better. The secondary was atrocious right? Well all of these guys, albeit young and unproven, are all 6 ft and better and when you watch them on film not one looked like they didn’t belong on the field. That’s exciting to me. I say that because the DLine probably won’t get a major pass rush leaving lots of pressure on the backers and back 5. Longer, faster and more aggressive guys will surely help. Especially in those jump ball situations. I rewatched the Cincy game last night and with all due respect Fortt looked so unaggressive it was sad. Swann looks like the best DB coming back.Yup, you can't really judge speed well on film unless you look at one guy for a LOT of games. But you can judge agility pretty easily. Awkwardness and first step quickness has a way of standing out.
A losing culture didn't bother Scott Frost any.
Look at what Fresno did from last year to this year?One bad year does not make a losing culture. They were 31-9 the 3 seasons prior to 0-12. A little better than the 11-26 record that Bobby D had in his 3 seasons prior to RE 2.0.
We heard the same gibberish from Diaco. We inherited a mess. P said he arrived to empty cupboards. This is the sorta talk coaches say to boosters. Edsall dropped the numbers from 2010 compared to 2017 to emphasize the crap job Diaco did. Coaches love doing this kind of thing.
Did I say that?Yes. But what is your point? You don't believe last year's team wasn't as fast or as strong as the Fiesta Bowl team? Really?
One bad year does not make a losing culture. They were 31-9 the 3 seasons prior to 0-12. A little better than the 11-26 record that Bobby D had in his 3 seasons prior to RE 2.0.
Tom Herman on what's he's learned in his first year at Texas: "That three straight losing seasons takes its toll on kids, it really does. The players were overmatched. So were the coaches.”
I’m sure RE could say the same thing.
With all due respect, your reply to my initial post made it seem like I was pointing out the self serving coachspeak aspect of Edsall. I was merely pointing out that if these players, with their potential, commit to the weightroom they can be very good. It has been proven that RE has an eye for kids with high upside.Did I say that?
My comment was to Herman saying what every coach that comes in and says. The last coach left him a mess. We know Diaco left Edsall a mess. Diaco claimed P left him a mess. Edsall said Diaco and Fridge left him a mess. P claimed Edsall left him empty cupboards. This is what coaches do. Had Herman gone 12-1, like he did at Houston his 1st year he wouldn't be singing that tune.
You're always trying to read more into things than what is said. It was a comment about coachspeak being self serving.
See zoocougar post. Edsall is not excluded from the self serving coach speak crowd. That's the point. I'm impressed by the coach who goes out and turns things around without needing to remind everyone of the mess they inherited. The people they're talking to, the ones who watch the games and would listen to their press conferences, know this. If a coach was not inheriting a mess, the previous coach wasn't fired.With all due respect, your reply to my initial post made it seem like I was pointing out the self serving coachspeak aspect of Edsall. I was merely pointing out that if these players, with their potential, commit to the weightroom they can be very good. It has been proven that RE has an eye for kids with high upside.
Can’t argue that point.See zoocougar post. Edsall is not excluded from the self serving coach speak crowd. That's the point. I'm impressed by the coach who goes out and turns things around without needing to remind everyone of the mess they inherited. The people they're talking to, the ones who watch the games and would listen to their press conferences, know this. If a coach was not inheriting a mess, the previous coach wasn't fired.
Did I say that?
My comment was to Herman saying what every coach that comes in and says. The last coach left him a mess. We know Diaco left Edsall a mess. Diaco claimed P left him a mess. Edsall said Diaco and Fridge left him a mess. P claimed Edsall left him empty cupboards. This is what coaches do. Had Herman gone 12-1, like he did at Houston his 1st year he wouldn't be singing that tune.
You're always trying to read more into things than what is said. It was a comment about coachspeak being self serving.