- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 29,923
- Reaction Score
- 49,045
Nah, I'm with Waylon on this part of the puzzle. If I rebuild, I want to stay in the Big East and put together the best football conference I can. Not leave the Big East and put together the best football conference I can. I still have yet to see one representative of a school say that the reluctance of the basketball schools to do something cost us an opportunity. And, when fans say it, it's always with respect to opportunities that have as many issues as solutions.
I'm not opposed to a Navy. Whatever we do is a bridge to the day of superconferences. I want the best football conference I can get, whether I play hoops with those schools or not. If you can rebuild with better football teams and programs than navy is fine. Where I'm not like Waylon is that it's not about markets at the moment -- it's about the BCS bid. I need the most political pressure and the best computer rankings I can generate. Navy gets me both. UCF, followed by ECU, gets me quality football. And UCF brings me a market to boot. Air Force is friggin far, but as a football only, giving me prestige, quality football and political pressure, not willing to say it's dumb.
Remember, we are not trying to build a conference for the next 100 years. We're trying to keep a BCS bid for a few years until the next earthquake.
It was reported last year that football schools entered into discussions about adding Kansas and such but that the whole thing was nixed by the basketball schools.