I will wager that the question (is UConn looking to replace PP) has been asked and I will wager heavily that the standard answer is "No. We do not foresee any coaching changes". This is said as the wheels are perilously close to falling off as it is and everything would become completely unhinged if a statement comes from UConn's administration even remotely suggesting a coaching change is being considered.
Daigneault, Conner and any other journalist publishing (or tweeting) this is merely passing on what he was told and not considering the possibility that they are not being given the complete truth.
I don't know how quickly those in charge are willing to act but I would be stunned if PP isn't informed that there must be major changes for him to remain. I also have a good idea on what things are like among the coaching staff and I do not see it as possible for the entirety of the offensive staff to return. If one member does return, at least two other members will not.
I think you are partially correct. The Program gives a Vote of Confidence (VOC) to maintain a hint of stability during the year. The real reason, IMO, is that any resplacement from the outside worth their salt is currently in a successful program and will not abandon their current team during week 8. All the movement between the regular season and the bowls is because, except for the teams playing in the BCS Championship, the bowls are basically an exhibition and the coaches can get a jump on recruiting (terrible rule, but its the NCAA).
The
beat writers are more or less obligated to take the Coaches and AD at their word. They can certainly read between the lines, but they cannot publish it based solely on conjecture; their stories need some factual basis. As do columnists' stories, but they have a little longer leash.
As far as the entire coaching staff returning: I tend to agree that the staff does not return in its entirety. The AD has a huge decision on his hands. He needs to balance maintaining the recruiting class (i.e coach continuity), improving of the product on the field (i.e. predict the coach's results with a full class of his own), all while appeasing both the whales and the little fish in the metal benches (i.e. maintaining/improving revenue). Remember, every 1,000 season tickets sold to us peeons equals about $350,000 in program revenue with at least $100,000 going directly to the athletic department. That ain't chump change to be sure.