This is a bad take pal.
Roger... OddsShark covers 5 Dimes. Drop overnight?
Saw them at Brown last year. URI lost. We have a chance.Unless you’ve actually watched Rhode Island how would you even guess at who has better players?
Your lack of explanation says that you believe that Rhody has the better players. Now that's a bad take.
Your lack of explanation says that you believe that Rhody has the better players. Now that's a bad take.
Unless you’ve actually watched Rhode Island how would you even guess at who has better players?
If that line is true, I'm about to ask you guys to borrow some money so I can put it on URI. Very hard to fathom how anyone can lay 2 scores with our defense right now.
It is hard to fathom anyone putting money on this game on either side. Here are two plausible outcomes:
1. We are just as awful as we looked last week, and find a way to lose or win on a late FG
2. We played a team that was undefeated last year and one that should be this year until Bowl season. Our guys, having faced some incredible size, speed and talent the last two weeks, face a team that is, comparatively, playing in sand. And they go to town.
UCF had a very hard time stopping our offense. Our own mistakes did most of that. URI is going to stop our offense? On the defensive side, guys who couldn't contain WR or RB, or shed blocks, may find that they can against this team.
I would not expect most sane football fans to pay attention to recruiting stars for this game, but if you add up the number of recruiting stars for Uconn vs URI, the totals are about 26 to 6 in favor of UConn.I think we do, by a lot. Is that the consensus view? If that's true we should beat URI, no?
I believe these players are much better than they have shown. By the results say they are the worse defensive players in the entire FBS. And they were the worst last year too. The cupboard is bare.
I will root for these players regardless of results. But the coaches and the coaching are another matter.
I would not expect most sane football fans to pay attention to recruiting stars for this game, but if you add up the number of recruiting stars for Uconn vs URI, the totals are about 26 to 6 in favor of UConn.
Don't know, would take some research. If you feel up to it, have at it. Lol. However, I would hazard a guess and say Boise State has more players who were 2 and 3 star recruits (maybe even a few 4 stars) than Uconn has.How does this ratio compare to the Boise game?
10 points didn’t make any sense. We’ve done nothing to deserve being double digit favorites. I would’ve expected to be 3-4 point favorites.Line is dropping hard @whaler11
How do you explain our poor offense? There are only 3 schools in the entire FBS that score less points per game than UConn (!), and UConn is 105th in yards per game (talking about offense).
All this when there are only 2 true sophomores and no freshmen starting. 5 of the 11 starters on offense are seniors by the way...
Disco recruited FCS kids - talent is pretty darn close. URI had the best receiver on the field for sure.Seems both teams are pretty evenly matched talent wise based on the score. UConn is however an FBS team and URI is FCS.
Hope you were being sarcastic. Unless I counted wrong they had 8 players from CT on their roster and at best only 5 saw the field.All of these URI players are from CT and they’re essentially the same quality as us.
Maybe SNY only called out CT kids but every play call was “from East Haven” or “from Hartford”Hope you were being sarcastic. Unless I counted wrong they had 8 players from CT on their roster and at best only 5 saw the field.