Pointing out there is more than one way?
or was it this you said:
Imagine thinking Division 1 basketball players need to be subbed out to be taught that turnovers are bad.
So you did say one way was better than the other. You are full of crap. You are saying that shouldn't even be an option.
Since Jim Calhoun used this approach, which I gave as evidence in my original post that you responded to, how could he not be included in this discussion. Are you really that dense?
Since I am not the one making stuff up and grasping at straws, I would concern yourself with being fragile.
Grasping at straws =/= strawman. You're still confused.
I was mocking you for implying that's the only way to teach. The joke wasn't for you, and it unsurprisingly went over your head, but saying they "don't need" to be subbed out to be taught turnovers are bad is not the same as saying "it's better to talk to them, than to sub them".
The latter is the strawman you created because your fragile "royal" ego won't allow you to just say "I don't know" and then promptly STFU about it.
So....
What did Hurley say in that "lost teaching moment"?