JS
Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 2,001
- Reaction Score
- 9,695
That's good. Here's a little to be OK with -- speaking here as a fellow poster and fan, not as a mod.i'm ok with the criticism of people that disagree with my views .
1. Hitting Geno for being too harsh on players is your shtick. You've done it with Collier, Stewart, Jefferson and others, e.g. Boykin. Either you think he's too harsh in general, or you get off on these hits and hence are a serial hitter.
2. Your judgments have no basis in any knowledge of the individual psyches of the players. Ergo, you assume all athletic young women would perform or develop better if treated differently from how Geno treats them. One size fits all.
3. Your judgments have no basis in any knowledge of the interactions between players and staff
beyond the quote, or the absence from a picture, or whatever other facet of the tip of the iceberg has caught your attention.
4. Given this absence of facts, your judgments are irrefutable. You have it both ways, i.e.:
a) If the player's performance is disappointing, you can say "I told you so."
b) If the player develops, yea even unto greatness, you say it would have happened sooner if only Geno had followed Michael's Guide to Proper Player Relations.
5. Last and by no means least, you couch your judgments in language that tends, maybe even is calculated, to be overblown and hence annoying. You admit that "perhaps" it is, but aver that you do so to get attention. b) If the player develops, yea even unto greatness, you say it would have happened sooner if only Geno had followed Michael's Guide to Proper Player Relations.
6. Well, you've got it. Enjoy. But try not to move into even higher dudgeon when the "drama queen" epithet comes back at you.