Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Lucelab113, post: 3539872, member: 10447"] "Carrington has zero time to develop. Her future is now." Well I am glad her future is now because we really only need her for this year. Which is the whole reason we are interested in her in the first place. "I'd be more in favor of her..." Well no offense but it doesn't matter if you are in favor of her. Geno seems to be. And what are you more in favor of? At this point it is a choice between Carrington and who? There are no mythical impactful 6'4 post players on the transfer market. You either want 10 players on next years team or you want 11. That's the choice. "UConn would be banking on some sort of natural healing that will allow her to practice & play next season. " Not sure how you know this. BTW Hunter and Camara are both great people and teammates who may not have been able to contribute much but it doesn't mean they didn't add anything to the team. If Carrington is not the same player than so what? Maybe she is a good teammate and can help mentor the younger players. Maybe she can play in the 4TH QTR when we are up 30 and let the starters rest. Maybe she can do even more. Who knows. Low risk high reward. " Further, if she was so valuable then Tara would have found a way to keep her. Maybe she just couldn't get accepted to Stanford grad school?" So now we are just throwing out ad hominems towards a young women whose crime is that Geno is apparently interested in adding her to next years team? Maybe Ms. Carrington wants to win a National Title? You know something Stanford hasn't done since Bush SR. was POTUS. Ya ever think about that? Nah. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,471

Messages: 4,397,401

Members: 10,209

Latest member: noelle