Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
DiJonai Carrington top-3
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 3537973, member: 1673"] In this latest page of discussion I see the most persuasive arguments yet both for and against Harrington. My own bias is that, if the result in the tournament is the same, and good basketball is being played during the regular season, I rather see four year players being developed than transfers. However, I am fine with a transfer coming in if it makes a difference in the tournament. The only trouble is one cannot be sure when that makes a difference. In fact, I cannot now think of a year when we know a transfer made such a difference in our tournament results. Anyways, that is my bias, now for the logic of the situation. GoCardinal brings up a compelling argument in favor. The one thing Carrington might bring that we have been lacking is emotional leadership. Her rebounding? Covered by multiple guards. Her slashing? Covered by multiple guards ... if it fits into the system. Emotional leadership? That has not been covered for awhile. On the other hand, though oldhuskie was making an argument in favor of Carrington, he points out that "insurance" should not be a reason for bringing her in. She's more Stevens than Adebayo. She likely expects to be a major contributor wherever she goes and it would be a disservice to her to use her as insurance, regardless of how comforting that may be to the BY or coaching staff. Unless ... if her injury has lowered her expectation to be a major contributor, then she might be OK with a limited role. Yet we know Williams, Westbrook, Makurat and Bueckers all have reasonable expectations to be major contributors. It could be that Muhl would be reasonable to expect to be a major contributor as well. With six players having those expectations, and two of them transfers, even with a three guard line-up that is a likely recipe for bad team chemistry. No doubt being the emotional leader we have needed would more than compensate for that problem, but I would expect Bueckers to exert herself as the emotional leader as soon as possible. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,465
Messages
4,397,280
Members
10,209
Latest member
noelle
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
DiJonai Carrington top-3
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom