Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Digging deeper into the numbers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="champs99and04, post: 4952151, member: 488"] And that might still be understating things given Clingan's gone from about 20 MPG over the first half of the season to 25 MPG over the second half. Not that UConn's the first team ever to scale back on their best guys' minutes for durability/sportsmanship reasons, but I don't recall it ever happening to this extreme with one player. The five games he missed alone might be enough to vault UConn past other teams on the list if you extrapolate his per minute production. To put Clingan's relatively limited PT into perspective, consider that Edey actually [I]averaged [/I]more minutes (32) than Clingan topped out at (31). Purdue's efficiency numbers would likely look vastly different with him playing fewer minutes (in fact, they probably don't get to Phoenix without him going close to the full 40 on Sunday). Then again, playing fewer minutes has allowed Clingan to expend more energy and foul more liberally (2.5 fours per 40 minutes for Edey to 3.6 for Clingan). That stuff all gets baked into the efficiency numbers as well. Still, if you're to believe the hypothetical title game line some books have released (which I think had UConn as a six-point favorite or so), it would support my theory that Vegas is anticipating Clingan extending well beyond his usual threshold in a potential title game (probably in the ballpark of 28-32). KenPom indicates it should be closer to UConn -4 under normal circumstances. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Digging deeper into the numbers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom