Waquoit
Mr. Positive
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 35,189
- Reaction Score
- 96,227
Not to someone who follows the NBA.I liked Scheierman at Creighton but that's quite the slight to Liam.
Not to someone who follows the NBA.I liked Scheierman at Creighton but that's quite the slight to Liam.
Would actually like to know what McNeeley’s plus traits are over Scheirman? He’s got an inch but BS has 2.5 inches on the standing reach. I’d call them an even heat physically. So then it becomes about intangibles and skills. I honestly don’t see them being all that different. Similar athletes.Not to someone who follows the NBA.
Well for one thing it took Scheierman 5 years of college to be ready for the NBA. He's a little over 5 years older than McNeeley. Their sizes aren't much different, Liam is a little bigger and he's a significantly better athlete than Scheierman.Would actually like to know what McNeeley’s plus traits are over Scheirman? He’s got an inch but BS has 2.5 inches on the standing reach. I’d call them an even heat physically. So then it becomes about intangibles and skills. I honestly don’t see them being all that different. Similar athletes.
Well for one thing it took Scheierman 5 years of college to be ready for the NBA. He's a little over 5 years older than McNeeley. Their sizes aren't much different, Liam is a little bigger and he's a significantly better athlete than Scheierman.
Is he a better athlete? I’m not so sure. The years don’t mean much when you talk about potential. What will McNeeley be doing better than BS in 5?Well for one thing it took Scheierman 5 years of college to be ready for the NBA. He's a little over 5 years older than McNeeley. Their sizes aren't much different, Liam is a little bigger and he's a significantly better athlete than Scheierman.
A 5 year head start in development doesn't matter much?Is he a better athlete? I’m not so sure. The years don’t mean much when you talk about potential. What will McNeeley be doing better than BS in 5?
It's all moot, though. The C's already have a player for that slot. If McNeeley shows the growth we'd all love to see and can help the C's down the line; Stevens will figure out something.A 5 year head start in development doesn't matter much?
McNeeley set a combine record in the shuttle run. McNeeley's standing vertical 30.5 inches, max vertical 36.5 inches. Scheierman standing vertical 27.5 inches, max vertical 32 inches.
I think 5 years matters tremendously and I think McNeeley will have a significantly better NBA career than Scheierman.
I guess - there are combine measurement then there is how a player uses them functionally. Solo apparently has a ridiculous vertical but we never see him elevate over anyone.A 5 year head start in development doesn't matter much?
McNeeley set a combine record in the shuttle run. McNeeley's standing vertical 30.5 inches, max vertical 36.5 inches. Scheierman standing vertical 27.5 inches, max vertical 32 inches.
I think 5 years matters tremendously and I think McNeeley will have a significantly better NBA career than Scheierman.
Sols had some serious blocks at the rim.I guess - there are combine measurement then there is how a player uses them functionally. Solo apparently has a ridiculous vertical but we never see him elevate over anyone.
I won’t be surprised if they have similar careers.
That's my point, Stephens drafts Spanish athleticism, but passed on AJax athleticism due to shooting. A legit reason for sure with respect to AJax.The kid Gonzalez was projected top 5 a year ago. Real Madrid is way better than any G League or college team this kid could have played on. He was sitting on bench because he was 18 and the players on Real Madrid are good.
Stevens drafted athleticism here and this guy has been essentially a professional since he was 9.
Well, in 2011 most of us felt pretty confident that we would beat Butler so... maybe not?I think Brad Stevens is smarter than the Boneyard![]()
They said he will play in the U.S. this year. But we will see.I don't know the Celtics situation all that well but I did read that a couple teams, due to the apron would likely draft euro players and keep them overseas for a couple years instead of having a low minutes guy in their roster with a guaranteed contract.
It's possible that even with the two contract dumps (Holiday, Porzingas) they didn't want another contract counting against the apron.
We'll know a lot more coming out of Summer League and once the season starts. But if Liam is one of the first forwards off the bench, he's already in a better NBA situation than Scheierman was with a similar spot taken in the draftI guess - there are combine measurement then there is how a player uses them functionally. Solo apparently has a ridiculous vertical but we never see him elevate over anyone.
I won’t be surprised if they have similar careers.
Kid has good form. Mcneelt hair 32% from a shorter 3, which is why he dropped. Gonzalez is 19 and has good mechanicsThat's my point, Stephens drafts Spanish athleticism, but passed on AJax athleticism due to shooting. A legit reason for sure with respect to AJax.
But notwithstanding limited playing time this year and bad shooting I've heard (on a draft reaction podcast I think?!) historically Hugu is a high 20's low30's 3pt percentage and in the 70's on FT's. Arguably inconsistent but time will tell. Ajax brings athleticism and defense. We knew then and now that AJax is far from a knock-down shooter and therefore doesn't fit in Joe Mazz's system of everyone shoots 3s when open. Hugo very TBD.
I don't think the Celtics made a mistake. Just look at his game logs.
How many games in there did he really dominate? 5? 7?
- 16 of 27 games with 15 pts or less.
- 7 of 27 games with 10 pts or less.
- 8 rebounds or more 9 times.
- Pretty poor assist numbers. 15 games with 2 or less.
- 61 assists to 50 TOs.
- Post season totals with 31.6 FG% and 4 for 24 (16.7%) from 3.
- After his ankle injury, his FG% dropped from 42.9% to 34.5% and his 3pt FG% dropped from 37.9% to 26.6%.
Pretty sure scouts heard of him.In the sense that they’ll look back and kick themselves for not drafting McNeeley, no. After next season they’ll still have Tatum, Brown, and whatever random shooters they’ll find to surround them with. They’ll be fine
In the sense that McNeeley could have been one of those movement shooters and instead they drafted a Euroleague wing that nobody has ever heard of, probably!
McNeeley underated. If he shot closer to 40% from 3 this past year he would have been a top 15 pick.The hit rate for late first round (15+)players isn’t really that high. The number who get a 2nd contract is roughly 45-50%. So a 28-29 pick is a coin flip as to whether he will even last. With that in mind you have / choices. Pick the best available or the guy who best fits your needs. Unlikely you’ll find a guy to build around. More likely a bench piece with hope he becomes a regular in a few years. It is also why a fair number of the late round guys spend some time in the G-League to get playing time rather than spend time all their on the bench.
We all hope Liam is one of the group that becomes a regular at a minimum. We hope more. But in the larger universe the Celtics chose the guy they think has a better chance of being one of the 45%. Only time will tell whether one, both or neither become important pieces.
I think Brad Stevens is smarter than the Boneyard![]()
That is possible. But , and this is the other thing about late picks, they generally get less opportunity. It’s why guys picked after 15 tend to spend time in the g-league, too.I love Brad. If he only texted Mazzella 1 play at the end of games one and two the C's choked away to the Knicks, they advance to the conference finals
But, I think Liam is going to be the steal of the 2025 draft. An injury that kept him out for a month and then had him underperform down the stretch hurt his draft position. I think he may very well play like the lottery pick he was heading towards before the injury
Time will tell, and opportunity matters