^^^^ This. And, HCBD should take an hard look in the mirror as well.Near the end of the game I noticed the look Diaco had on the sideline and commented that I thought this performance will give him an opportunity to rip the team to get their attention. After preaching peace and love and the positive culture of success he now can be the brutal dictator for a week. Expect some player personnel changes and don't think that tirade wasn't meant for his coordinators to hear also. The play calling was putrid on O and the schemes on D that garnered nothing from the Michigan game, were highly suspect.
BD looked like he was sporting a 10 pm shadow. Maybe it was evil BD or someone fed him after midnight. We had no business being within 20 let alone leading in the third quarter. There were so many things wrong. It started with the protection and the off coverage. Williams got abused all night and Stewart went back to zone covering no one in particular. But the game turned on the obvious on side kick attempt. You could see Tarbutt scanning the front line of BYU looking for a target spot tipping the play. BYU botched the hands play. Nearly all of our success was a direct result of BYU mistakes.
The three things that did look good were the inside run defense, the deep coverage (non-williams division), and Newsome. Sherriffs may be getting close to Whitmer level PTSD. It looks like it is affecting his play and decision making. I don't think he has any idea how much time he is going to have.
Homework for the week is to figure out a counter to the blitz.
It's not bait, it is as legitimate as any rosy scenario. And speaking of Boyle, you preferred Whitmer, WTF. Whitmer lead the team to 2-10. That's your hero? That is suppose to make sense?Why do you guys take this guy's bait? He is deliberately obtuse, never played a down of football in his life and thinks that because he wrote a book about Star Trek he knows about football. I notice he never quotes the Boyle stats anymore. Could a poster have ever been more wrong and not admit it? I have him on ignore. It's much more relaxing on here since I did so
And anyone who makes a statement like that lacks credibility. Not taking the bait bass man.Anyone who thinks UConn football will ever be good while Diaco is the head coach is setting themselves up to be disappointed.
Palatine
What would YOU win with PP recruits?
Glad to hear Diaco ticked off, although that demeanor is pretty shocking coming from him.
So no more "peace and love?"
Maybe bench some ineffective Offensive lineman this week.
Is this true? Palatine is an author and wrote a book about Star Trek? This is too freaking funny, one of the funniest things I've ever read on the boneyard.He really wrote a book about Star Trek? That's just too awesome to be true.
If Oak and Rutherford are the future, why aren't they starting now? Hopkins is a sophomore. Samra needs to be replaced and right now, Rutherford is a tackle, not a guard. SO, who replaces him? I think Crozier goes to his spot.The main problem with this team that isn't going to get any better this year is the offensive line. As long as they're ineffective our offense will continue to sputter at times. This won't be rectified until next season when Diaco's guys (Crozier, Oak and Rutherford) are starting at LG, C & RG respectively.
If I'm Diaco, I:
bench Levy (just terrible OL pass blocker),
demote ADams from Captain (can't be a leader and make behaviors mistakes that cause the team to lose)
bench Stewart - perpetually out of position
Find new punter returner and disallow another fair catch all season
Sit - Max - missed pass block pickups, Johnson for sleep walking
And tell rest of the Oline if the miss another assignment they will be pulled and riding the pine. Every o-lineman needs to protect BS like his life depended on it. I'd rather see holding than the QB get hit.
We have some younger guys that need to get inserted. There has to be consequences for missing assignments.How many game-ready offensive linemen do you think we have on the bench? Just wondering.
We have some younger guys that need to get inserted. There has to be consequences for missing assignments.
If Oak and Rutherford are the future, why aren't they starting now? Hopkins is a sophomore. Samra needs to be replaced and right now, Rutherford is a tackle, not a guard. SO, who replaces him? I think Crozier goes to his spot.
As has been stated, our OL seems to be the biggest problem. In my humble opinion, if we had a good OL we probably would be 4-0. That to me tells me there has been considerable progress as a team. The OL is probably the toughest unit to get to gel, especially when there was a couple of years of minimal strength and conditioning.
My fear is the OL that we currently have does not have the final pieces yet and that means another year or two of "growth".
If Oak and Rutherford are the future, why aren't they starting now? Hopkins is a sophomore. Samra needs to be replaced and right now, Rutherford is a tackle, not a guard. SO, who replaces him? I think Crozier goes to his spot.