Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 3831647, member: 3535"] Overall, I don't think CWIll needs to be consistent in terms of being good (she just needs to be "good enough")from 3 if Paige and Evina are consistent. And Paige and Evina overall have been pretty consistent. I guess it depends on what each person defines as consistent. Paige and Evina have been terrific. That's enough to open things up for CWill. It's not like the elite teams have 5 all-american DPOY's on their team. CWill had shown vs Tenn to still be able to score in a good efficient manner in a tight game vs a good, tall, athletic team even when one of her two counterparts (Paige in this case) couldn't hit a thing. *** Sue Bird and DT missed every single 3pt shot in the title game vs Oklahoma. If it weren't for Cash, Tamika, and Jones UCONN would have lost in the finals. Thus going into DT's jr year- no titles and two of 3 big games in FF she went 0FOR from 3.-- Would the narrative have been in that FF Texas game that she is "too inconsistent?" Just bringing up sometimes maybe we over-analyze? Paige is the go-to player and a terrific shooter. This year Evina is shooting at over 43% from 3 which is terrific. OFC they can have clunkers but overall isn't two in which one is super, super while the other is very, very good while both a terrific passers and both can see over smaller guards - is CWILL that "awful" that we think stating that "we have a pretty good perimeter scoring team" is wrong? Saw a Law and Order episode in which the prosecutor told the jury that having "reasonable doubt" isn't the same as having "any doubt." How much do we want to doubt what Paige and Evina are doing when the stats are showing they are doing very, very well? [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,486

Messages: 4,398,169

Members: 10,212

Latest member: MurrDog