- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 37,283
- Reaction Score
- 39,398
Didn’t want to call you out, but please don’t pull that again!Sorry for how we played. I didn't realize I couldn't start the game late on peacock so only watched the 2nd half
Didn’t want to call you out, but please don’t pull that again!Sorry for how we played. I didn't realize I couldn't start the game late on peacock so only watched the 2nd half
I feel like this has been said a few too many times this season now. At some point you do want to show an ability to play a full 40, have a killer instinct and not constantly play down. Take the W for sure as we need every one we can get, but not what I would called a building block.Just take the win.
They're not great but Xavier had double digit 2nd half leads on the road vs both Marquette and St Johns in the past week and a half, they're not an easy out and I thought it was encouraging that UConn had a chance to win in their building without Liam before the step back tonight vs Depaul.The C word struggled at home against Xavier tonight. They ain’t great. We just missed our chance against them last time.
Great game from our two transfers, who have been much maligned on here. Aiden kept them in it in the first half and Tarris dominated the second half.Team had no energy first half. No fouling because they just didn’t play hard. Corrected that late, carried it on and put DePaul away. Ugly at times but a huge game from Reed, clutch moments from Ball. Stewart was huge in the first half. Diarra is not 100% but we don’t have Nowell. Gut check game for him. Alex just frigid but made some great passes.
On to Marquette and hopefully we have Liam and Alex finds his shot.
The 2006 team came down to the wire all the time. They cruised like 4 times all year. Unless you are counting Albany. This was indeed very similar to Albany.For the old timers, this reminds a bit of a 2006 team game, where they stink it up for a big chunk of the game but if you look at the final score it seemed like a by-the-numbers cruise to a comfortable win.
They led at half and beat a much better Xavier team by about the same margin as we beat lousy Depaul for their 7th? straight win, and "They ain't great"? Huh? What are we?The C word struggled at home against Xavier tonight. They ain’t great. We just missed our chance against them last time.
Hurley has never beaten them at their place and Creighton is better than us right now.The C word struggled at home against Xavier tonight. They ain’t great. We just missed our chance against them last time.
See Albany, 1st round NCAAFor the old timers, this reminds a bit of a 2006 team game, where they stink it up for a big chunk of the game but if you look at the final score it seemed like a by-the-numbers cruise to a comfortable win.
Not that simple. Two of those guys sleepwalked through the first half.Going to continue to push to give more responsibility to our more talented players. We turned it up a notch once we turned the game over to Solo, Stewart, and Reed in the second half.
I don’t doubt that. Just saying they are beatable.Hurley has never beaten them at their place and Creighton is better than us right now.
Back in the Perno era, the good teams had many games like this against us an I got the feeling that they couldn't have given a crap.For the old timers, this reminds a bit of a 2006 team game, where they stink it up for a big chunk of the game but if you look at the final score it seemed like a by-the-numbers cruise to a comfortable win.
We scored a point a minute for the first three quarters of the the first half. Still got out of the 60s (barely) for a change.Dropped one spot on offense in KP to 11, picked up 7 on D up to 125. But the win is really all that matters tonight. Probably worst half I recall since KO years. Even 2nd half wasn't pretty, but inside defense was much, much better, leading to 19 point swing.
Well that’s because we usually lean on Diarra and Karaban.Not that simple. Two of those guys sleepwalked through the first half.
If he was really, we win the last game. I think the position is still open.Solo is our go to guy. Excited to see him in some tournament play. Might show something special like past players
He's clearly the guy with Liam out.If he was really, we win the last game. I think the position is still open.
The 2006 team came down to the wire all the time. They cruised like 4 times all year. Unless you are counting Albany. This was indeed very similar to Albany.
St Joe's loss at Gampel early in the Hurley tenure is the only first half I can remember being worseDropped one spot on offense in KP to 11, picked up 7 on D up to 125. But the win is really all that matters tonight. Probably worst half I recall since KO years. Even 2nd half wasn't pretty, but inside defense was much, much better, leading to 19 point swing.
His block to bucket was one of the highlights of his year and a swing point. He had two blocks and a steal tonight. His ability to get that 3 off quickly is pretty amazing. It’s an interesting shot because his arms look extended, so it makes the shot look long, but he catches and just flicks it from that position.If he was really, we win the last game. I think the position is still open.
The issue with Stewart is he's just as likely to come out the next game just getting cardio in. He played over 30 minutes vs Butler and only took 3 shots and one of those was a fast break dunk. Playing over 30 minutes at the wing he should stumble into at least 5 shots just by being on the floor, he's gotta stay aggressive when he touches the ball.Well that’s because we usually lean on Diarra and Karaban.
We should go back to letting them being excellent role players and allow Solo and Stewart to be the stars with Liam out.
I know a lot has been said about Hurley’s staff and how we have 3 head coach worthy assistants, but can someone explain to me why we don’t approach games vs opponents without a good defensive big men as “Tarris Games” and start the game with the intention of getting him 12-15 shots?THANK. YOU. TARRIS. REED.