If those are 2 top 25 teams, I dunno. Rutgers plays no offense and DePaul has zero idea how to defend penetration.
And aren't those "whuppins" so enjoyable to watch? Among my favorites of the year, especially if it's a first-class beatdown.No offense to Rutgers, but they have a whuppin' coming their way on February 4.
I agree. Most of their out of bounds plays were horrible.wow that was something. not the kind of meltdown you'd expect from a Doug Bruno coached team...
wow that was something. not the kind of meltdown you'd expect from a Doug Bruno coached team...
Good enough to help out with the WNT.Is Coach Bruno considered a good coach based on accomplishments as a coach or because he is Coach Auriemma's good buddy?
wow that was something. not the kind of meltdown you'd expect from a Doug Bruno coached team...
If those are 2 top 25 teams, I dunno. Rutgers plays no offense and DePaul has zero idea how to defend penetration.
If their goal is to be a Sweet 16 team, sure, it was a step in the right direction. If their goals for the season are loftier than that, they have no business being in that position to begin with against DePaul.No credit to Rutgers for pulling victory from the jaws of defeat? No praise for overcoming a 16 point deficit with under 11 minutes to play?
No credit to Rutgers for pulling victory from the jaws of defeat? No praise for overcoming a 16 point deficit with under 11 minutes to play?