UConnDan97
predicting undefeated seasons since 1983
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2012
- Messages
- 12,204
- Reaction Score
- 44,531
Someone help me, why are we still pulling this bull**** football only bull****? We need to form an all sports league, is it not obvious?
East
UConn
Cinci
Temple
Memphis
USF
UCF
Navy and ECU football only
West
SMU
Tulane (I guess we have to, but do we?). I'd throw their asses to the curb
Houston
Boise
SDSU
New Mexico
Nevada
UNLV and Fresno football only?
I guess I just answered my own question, but wouldn't you want UNLV instead of Boise for all sports? Or is this not where we're heading?
The issue at hand is this: We are trying to cobble together the best football conference that we can. The fact that we all have olympic sports going on is secondary to everyone in the conference with the notable exceptions of UConn, Cincy, Memphis, and Temple. SDSU and Boise have already set themselves up in the Big West for olympic sports, and the only other "football only"s are ECU and Navy. Navy is not willing to join us with their olympic sports, and ECU would join in a heartbeat if they are asked to. Now that the C-7 is gone, I fully expect that to happen.
The only reason to set up a western division in the olympic sports is to give our western partners a more stable place for their entire athletic departments. Keep in mind that if the plan is to try to play everyone in olympic sports on a regular basis, east and west, then we will cripple ourselves with ridiculous travel costs for sports that nobody cares about (i.e., volleyball). This CANNOT happen!!! We can have two "separate but allied" olympic divisions of the Big East, and we may be able to set up "OOC's" against each other in some instances (i.e., SDSU vs. UConn in hoops), but for the most part, it doesn't help the eastern schools one bit...