- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 3,084
- Reaction Score
- 6,284
Seems we're seeing the same thing. You'd think the staff would as well.We've gotta do something different there. Last year, for a myriad of reasons, teams would come out and play our big in those sets. That allowed for Samson to slip/PNR or Donovan to use his excellent passing ability to hit cutters or at least threaten to take a J. But it's abundantly clear that opposing coaches know that Samson/Reed cannot/will not take that shot so they drop their big. That allows defenses to overplay the cutters/hedge, etc. and they have a goalie waiting to rim protect. It's legit playing 4 on 5. The fact we ran that set on our last play in regulation was asinine, imo, since we've seen how opposing D will not play Samson/Reed in that set.
I think Reed can hit that shot but it doesn't seem like he has the green light to take it. Plus, it's a significantly bigger issue with Samson because everyone knows he is no threat whatsoever in that position. It's similar to how defenses started playing Andre and to a lesser extent, Castle. You've got to do something different.
Both Samson Johnson and RJ are solid at the line for bigs, so one would think turning towards the basket when no one is on them and taking a J at or just inside the foul line a few times a game would be in order. If they hit one or two, think about how that will open things up.
Why not have those two work on taking Js there within the flow of the offense in practice and see if it works? Maybe they have and it hasn't, but I've yet to see it in a game yet.