jd krill no longer listed as a verbal on tos...
im not playing games medic. im speaking up becuase others wont. without a couple here who are throwing flames, all this ad bs gets no attention and ppl are just upset about PP and GDL but dont see the big issue. but when your uconn and your losing juco kids to fau and texas st, dont u think its time to ask a question or 2? no its all good, when tulane or usu rips a db away we can also just say awe shucks get em next time tiger!
There is only one reason solid recruits go to places like FAU. This is not a loss. You need to relax....damnjd krill no longer listed as a verbal on tos...
im not playing games medic. im speaking up becuase others wont. without a couple here who are throwing flames, all this ad bs gets no attention and ppl are just upset about PP and GDL but dont see the big issue. but when your uconn and your losing juco kids to fau and texas st, dont u think its time to ask a question or 2? no its all good, when tulane or usu rips a db away we can also just say awe shucks get em next time tiger!
we are being dick heads imho. why can't we just be like florida, bama, michigan and psu with fball and bball players . why do we have to be yale. its so stupid, it snow how u win or burst onto the scene. so many kids have been said no to and so many more after hearing/readingt he metrics just throw uconn to the side. its truly a dam joke. i get the whole this is my school i want good grades argument. fine, then dont play big boy sports and think your going to win. look at harvard. enjoy your ****ing future.
Because...if a university admits athletes without regard for whether they are a student or not, they are basically setting up a professional league. It's not the university's mission. The first mission is and always should be education, not sports team wins. If you want to root for a team that can recruit the best athletes, root for a major or minor league pro team. Leave us to our misery.It is hard to imagine what they're thinking. Harvard would be a nice future, but we shouldn't look to athletes to replicate Harvard's Nobel prize winners. Why isn't enough to accept great athletes and great scholars, why do they have to be the same people?
Because...if a university admits athletes without regard for whether they are a student or not, they are basically setting up a professional league. It's not the university's mission. The first mission is and always should be education, not sports team wins. If you want to root for a team that can recruit the best athletes, root for a major or minor league pro team. Leave us to our misery.
Because...if a university admits athletes without regard for whether they are a student or not, they are basically setting up a professional league. It's not the university's mission. The first mission is and always should be education, not sports team wins. If you want to root for a team that can recruit the best athletes, root for a major or minor league pro team. Leave us to our misery.
Agreed. Absolutely. In the absence of such standards, universities have to set priorities. I, for one, as much as I love seeing us win, believe that the educational mission is a higher priority than the athletic. It's too bad that the Louisvilles, Mississippis, and Clemsons of this world don't. But that shouldn't cause us to sell ourselves cheap.I think the frustration that you are seeing people voice is due solely to the fact that all participating universities do not adhere to the same standards of recruiting. Unlike a pro league, where everyone plays under the same rules, college sports has a wide variability in who a university will allow to play for them versus a competitor school. Bryce McNeal is a prime example, whereby he did not meet UConn's criteria but he met Louisville's.
I'm sure that a large part of the frustration is watching some of these players put on jerseys for other "institutions of learning" without any penalty. To me, although I understand the need for a university to set its own criteria for acceptance, I think that there should be sets of rules that govern who can be accepted at D-1 institutions (outside of the simple, "get a 700 on your SAT's" type thing)...
It's too bad that the Louisvilles, Mississippis, and Clemsons of this world don't. But that shouldn't cause us to sell ourselves cheap.
it makes you wonder if certain institutions aren't ALREADY behaving like they are a pro league and not a collegiate one....
you're wondering? Isn't it obvious?
Jd krill Des just tweeted another academic flop. Can someone explain what is the criteria? We all know it is different admission for athletes but what are the requirements
Just lost counting last year wide reciever. Burlingame. And now krill
we are being dick heads imho. why can't we just be like florida, bama, michigan and psu with fball and bball players . why do we have to be yale. its so stupid, it snow how u win or burst onto the scene. so many kids have been said no to and so many more after hearing/readingt he metrics just throw uconn to the side. its truly a dam joke. i get the whole this is my school i want good grades argument. fine, then dont play big boy sports and think your going to win. look at harvard. enjoy your ****ing future.